Skip to main content
Meta Stack Exchange

Return to Answer

Active reading [<https://meta.stackexchange.com/legal/trademark-guidance> (the last section)]. Added some context.
Source Link
This_is_NOT_a_forum
This_is_NOT_a_forum
  • 6.7k
  • 4
  • 37
  • 55

I agree with this proposal - we. We are operating under a similar policy on the Politics stackPolitics Stack Exchange site. While moderating and removing answers posted using this tool, I've noticed that the ChatGPT tool is particularly good at generating content which seems eminently plausible to someone without knowledge of the topic -, which in some cases has led to arguments developing in comment threads. In one case, the poster of the AI-generated content appeared to be feeding the critical comments back into ChatGPT and posting its replies.

Furthermore, if AI-generated answers were allowed, this would jeopardise the StackExchangeStack Exchange reputation system, which is meant to be a decent measure of expertise and trust that the community places in a user. Users obtaining reputation through posting AI-generated content would not -, in my opinion -, have demonstrated that they are worthy of that trust or measure of expertise.

I agree with this proposal - we are operating under a similar policy on the Politics stack. While moderating and removing answers posted using this tool, I've noticed that the ChatGPT tool is particularly good at generating content which seems eminently plausible to someone without knowledge of the topic - which in some cases has led to arguments developing in comment threads. In one case, the poster of the AI-generated content appeared to be feeding the critical comments back into ChatGPT and posting its replies.

Furthermore, if AI-generated answers were allowed, this would jeopardise the StackExchange reputation system, which is meant to be a decent measure of expertise and trust that the community places in a user. Users obtaining reputation through posting AI-generated content would not - in my opinion - have demonstrated that they are worthy of that trust or measure of expertise.

I agree with this proposal. We are operating under a similar policy on the Politics Stack Exchange site. While moderating and removing answers posted using this tool, I've noticed that the ChatGPT tool is particularly good at generating content which seems eminently plausible to someone without knowledge of the topic, which in some cases has led to arguments developing in comment threads. In one case, the poster of the AI-generated content appeared to be feeding the critical comments back into ChatGPT and posting its replies.

Furthermore, if AI-generated answers were allowed, this would jeopardise the Stack Exchange reputation system, which is meant to be a decent measure of expertise and trust that the community places in a user. Users obtaining reputation through posting AI-generated content would not, in my opinion, have demonstrated that they are worthy of that trust or measure of expertise.

Source Link
CDJB
CDJB
  • 1.1k
  • 8
  • 15

I agree with this proposal - we are operating under a similar policy on the Politics stack. While moderating and removing answers posted using this tool, I've noticed that the ChatGPT tool is particularly good at generating content which seems eminently plausible to someone without knowledge of the topic - which in some cases has led to arguments developing in comment threads. In one case, the poster of the AI-generated content appeared to be feeding the critical comments back into ChatGPT and posting its replies.

Furthermore, if AI-generated answers were allowed, this would jeopardise the StackExchange reputation system, which is meant to be a decent measure of expertise and trust that the community places in a user. Users obtaining reputation through posting AI-generated content would not - in my opinion - have demonstrated that they are worthy of that trust or measure of expertise.