Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • 1
    If high-rep users "have demonstrated that they are worthy of that trust or measure of expertise", why not trust them to only copy ChatGPT when it's correct? Commented Dec 16, 2022 at 17:15
  • 1
    @FranckDernoncourt that sounds so... soulless. as a high rep user, don't you take some pride in the humanity of your style and thought-process?
    – starball
    Commented Dec 16, 2022 at 18:06
  • 2
    @starball no pride, just knowledge exchange or improving one's reasoning ability. Commented Dec 16, 2022 at 18:07
  • 1
    Politics is primarily about persuasion and "oughts", not facts and "ises" - using the term "plausible" muddies the waters. If someone can be tricked into debating one's own political position with an overgrown language model that performs no critical thinking, that should be taken as a sign that the human in that exchange has also not met a minimum standard of critical thinking. Commented Mar 27, 2023 at 18:50