Timeline for Help us identify new roles for community members
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2023 at 19:49 | history | rollback | kruchkamgar |
Rollback to Revision 11 - Roll back trivial, opinion-based changes that neglect original intent
|
|
| Dec 6, 2023 at 15:35 | comment | added | This_is_NOT_a_forum | (I did not bump it. This page was on the main page today, 2023-12-06. I am not sure which action caused it. Probably a new answer that was later deleted.) | |
| Dec 6, 2023 at 15:28 | history | edited | This_is_NOT_a_forum | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Active reading [<https://stackoverflow.design/brand/copywriting/naming/> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruby_on_Rails> <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/reenergise#Verb>]. Added some context.
|
| Dec 6, 2023 at 1:55 | history | edited | kruchkamgar | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
simplify language, with plainer verbiage
|
| Dec 18, 2022 at 22:22 | comment | added | This_is_NOT_a_forum | "gaps in basic-to-intermediate 'get-moving' enabler knowledge": What? | |
| Dec 18, 2022 at 22:19 | comment | added | This_is_NOT_a_forum | Though only humans misspell Stack Overflow. | |
| Dec 18, 2022 at 21:53 | comment | added | This_is_NOT_a_forum | @Rob: That was my thought as well when I read it. Who would write word salad like "re-energize the foundational meaning" and "derived from a large, varied body of spiritual wisdoms"? What does it even mean? | |
| Dec 16, 2022 at 20:13 | comment | added | kruchkamgar | @starball, take a look at the context first, then the links. should I include an appendix on the enneagram, as standard practice? Next person's comment: the suggestion lies with thinking outside the box...looking beyond roles, and into how people recognize [each other's] behavior, first. | |
| Dec 16, 2022 at 11:08 | comment | added | Rob | I can't actually tease out what the suggestion is here? Was this generated by ChatGPT ? | |
| Dec 16, 2022 at 10:53 | history | edited | Journeyman Geek | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited to direct link to Sanzhar Yeleuov's answer
|
| Dec 16, 2022 at 6:18 | history | edited | kruchkamgar | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
voluminous spelling error
|
| Dec 16, 2022 at 6:13 | history | edited | kruchkamgar | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
change to superscripts --seems accepted way for footnotes/endnotes. added link to 3-way handshake prior edit
|
| Dec 16, 2022 at 6:11 | history | edited | kruchkamgar | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 162 characters in body
|
| Dec 16, 2022 at 6:07 | history | edited | kruchkamgar | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 10 characters in body
|
| Dec 16, 2022 at 6:00 | history | edited | Journeyman Geek | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fixed table earlier. Changed asterisk based footnotes to numbers so we don't have to futz around with escaping asterisks
|
| Dec 16, 2022 at 5:59 | comment | added | starball | As someone who knows nothing about "enneagram's" nine strategies of life, I find the suggestion pretty unclear. | |
| Dec 16, 2022 at 5:58 | history | edited | kruchkamgar | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 10 characters in body
|
| Dec 16, 2022 at 5:56 | history | edited | kruchkamgar | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 12 characters in body
|
| Dec 16, 2022 at 5:55 | history | edited | kruchkamgar | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
table seems not to work, try to fix
|
| Dec 16, 2022 at 5:54 | history | answered | kruchkamgar | CC BY-SA 4.0 |