Rollback to Revision 11 - Roll back trivial, opinion-based changes that neglect original intent

Source Link

edited Dec 8, 2023 at 19:49

3
2

'identity' infrastructure (for roles)[for roles]

(Assumptions)

Many perspectives

Each user will likely see 'gaps' in their experiences on Stack Exchange network (SE); and in its content.

This corpus of content appears to have gaps at the basic-to-intermediate level to help newcomers to 'get moving'; I say this from my own past experiences on Stack Overflow—difficultystack overflow -- difficulty with topics like configuration in Ruby on RailsRails, or getting started with CI/CD, etcCI/CD...etc.

Voluminous content

SE appears blessed with a huge amount of content. Given the broad scope of the SE problem (of[of education and knowledge management);management]; and the huge variety of users;

An organic approach

to contribution could reenergizere-energize the foundational meaning of SE.

Each person offers a particular 'energy' according to the "enneagram's" nine strategies of life—

The enthusiast¹ may produce a volume of engaging content—atcontent – at times a bit too speedily—thatspeedily – that the reformer may critique and adjust. The harmonizer or community promoter may enjoy² filling small-but-important gaps in the body of content, over which others might glide past. The investigator will make profoundly insightful contributions, while the challenger may drive momentum.

Recognizing these characteristic behaviors³ (either[either with tag suggestions like how social media has many types of 'likes' or annotative emojis—in Signalemojis –in Signal, or even WhatsAppWhatsApp for example)example], can create the means or 'API' by which to layer interesting functionality—whetherfunctionality --whether privileges or even custom interfaces (!) to surface relevant content and ‘facilitators’.

Graduated development paths, constellations of influence, or 'leveling-up' (all coarsely put), (perhaps[perhaps in the way the Masons (as in a masonic lodge...) do)do] could allow useful structure (in[in seemingly a most open/pliable and ‘accessible’ basic format)format]. And these paths may emerge from the ground-level nine 'paths'⁴.

¹ (or give it an SO-specific name)
²overlaps fine and likely
³carefully derived from a large, varied body of spiritual wisdoms... SufismSufism, and many others.
⁴ multiple or all certainly possible to any user: steps on the journey to revelation

²exhibit
deceptively nuanced, even if simple question of a ‘three-way handshake’ - see Sanzhar Yeleuov’s answer, and [charged?] argument, in comments section

Perhapsperhaps, this table helps elucidate possible nuance, and fill gaps in the process (if not, then just illustrative of the possibilities :D)

Actionaction	Resultresult
client initiates with [packet] data (SYN)	server may now confirm data transmission success, from client (ISN x)
(together) - server responds (ACK) - server sends own data (SYN)	client may confirm data transmission it received from server (ISN y)
client responds (ACK)	both parties understand what comes next (2 ACKs); syncing/test transmissions complete (2 SYNs)

'identity' infrastructure (for roles)

(Assumptions)

Many perspectives

Each user will likely see 'gaps' in their experiences on Stack Exchange network (SE); and in its content.

This corpus of content appears to have gaps at the basic-to-intermediate level to help newcomers to 'get moving'; I say this from my own past experiences on Stack Overflow—difficulty with topics like configuration in Ruby on Rails, or getting started with CI/CD, etc.

Voluminous content

SE appears blessed with a huge amount of content. Given the broad scope of the SE problem (of education and knowledge management); and the huge variety of users;

An organic approach

to contribution could reenergize the foundational meaning of SE.

Each person offers a particular 'energy' according to the "enneagram's" nine strategies of life—

The enthusiast¹ may produce a volume of engaging content—at times a bit too speedily—that the reformer may critique and adjust. The harmonizer or community promoter may enjoy² filling small-but-important gaps in the body of content, over which others might glide past. The investigator will make profoundly insightful contributions, while the challenger may drive momentum.

Recognizing these characteristic behaviors³ (either with tag suggestions like how social media has many types of 'likes' or annotative emojis—in Signal, or even WhatsApp for example), can create the means or 'API' by which to layer interesting functionality—whether privileges or even custom interfaces (!) to surface relevant content and ‘facilitators’.

Graduated development paths, constellations of influence, or 'leveling-up' (all coarsely put), (perhaps in the way the Masons (as in a masonic lodge...) do) could allow useful structure (in seemingly a most open/pliable and ‘accessible’ basic format). And these paths may emerge from the ground-level nine 'paths'⁴.

¹ (or give it an SO-specific name) ²overlaps fine and likely ³carefully derived from a large, varied body of spiritual wisdoms... Sufism, and many others. ⁴ multiple or all certainly possible to any user: steps on the journey to revelation

²exhibit
deceptively nuanced, even if simple question of a ‘three-way handshake’ - see Sanzhar Yeleuov’s answer, and [charged?] argument, in comments section

Perhaps, this table helps elucidate possible nuance, and fill gaps in the process (if not, then just illustrative of the possibilities :D)

Action	Result
client initiates with [packet] data (SYN)	server may now confirm data transmission success, from client (ISN x)
(together) - server responds (ACK) - server sends own data (SYN)	client may confirm data transmission it received from server (ISN y)
client responds (ACK)	both parties understand what comes next (2 ACKs); syncing/test transmissions complete (2 SYNs)

'identity' infrastructure [for roles]

(Assumptions)

Many perspectives

Each user will likely see 'gaps' in their experiences on Stack Exchange network (SE); and in its content.

This corpus of content appears to have gaps at the basic-to-intermediate level to help newcomers to 'get moving'; I say this from my own past experiences on stack overflow -- difficulty with topics like configuration in Rails, or getting started with CI/CD...etc.

Voluminous content

SE appears blessed with a huge amount of content. Given the broad scope of the SE problem [of education and knowledge management]; and the huge variety of users;

An organic approach

to contribution could re-energize the foundational meaning of SE.

Each person offers a particular 'energy' according to the "enneagram's" nine strategies of life—

The enthusiast¹ may produce a volume of engaging content – at times a bit too speedily – that the reformer may critique and adjust. The harmonizer or community promoter may enjoy² filling small-but-important gaps in the body of content, over which others might glide past. The investigator will make profoundly insightful contributions, while the challenger may drive momentum.

Recognizing these characteristic behaviors³ [either with tag suggestions like how social media has many types of 'likes' or annotative emojis –in Signal, or even WhatsApp for example], can create the means or 'API' by which to layer interesting functionality --whether privileges or even custom interfaces (!) to surface relevant content and ‘facilitators’.

Graduated development paths, constellations of influence, or 'leveling-up' (all coarsely put), [perhaps in the way the Masons (as in masonic lodge...) do] could allow useful structure [in seemingly a most open/pliable and ‘accessible’ basic format]. And these paths may emerge from the ground-level nine 'paths'⁴.

¹ (or give it an SO-specific name)
²overlaps fine and likely
³carefully derived from a large, varied body of spiritual wisdoms... Sufism, and many others.
⁴ multiple or all certainly possible to any user: steps on the journey to revelation

²exhibit
deceptively nuanced, even if simple question of a ‘three-way handshake’ - see Sanzhar Yeleuov’s answer, and [charged?] argument, in comments section

perhaps, this table helps elucidate possible nuance, and fill gaps in the process (if not, then just illustrative of the possibilities :D)

action	result
client initiates with [packet] data (SYN)	server may now confirm data transmission success, from client (ISN x)
(together) - server responds (ACK) - server sends own data (SYN)	client may confirm data transmission it received from server (ISN y)
client responds (ACK)	both parties understand what comes next (2 ACKs); syncing/test transmissions complete (2 SYNs)

Active reading [<https://stackoverflow.design/brand/copywriting/naming/> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruby_on_Rails> <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/reenergise#Verb>]. Added some context.

Source Link

edited Dec 6, 2023 at 15:28

This_is_NOT_a_forum

6.7k
4
37
55

'identity' infrastructure [for roles](for roles)

(Assumptions)

Many perspectives

Each user will likely see 'gaps' in their experiences on Stack Exchange network (SE); and in its content.

This corpus of content appears to have gaps at the basic-to-intermediate level to help newcomers to 'get moving'; I say this from my own past experiences on stack overflow -- difficultyStack Overflow—difficulty with topics like configuration in RailsRuby on Rails, or getting started with CI/CD...etcCI/CD, etc.

Voluminous content

SE appears blessed with a huge amount of content. Given the broad scope of the SE problem [of(of education and knowledge management];management); and the huge variety of users;

An organic approach

to contribution could re-energizereenergize the foundational meaning of SE.

Each person offers a particular 'energy' according to the "enneagram's" nine strategies of life—

The enthusiast¹ may produce a volume of engaging content – atcontent—at times a bit too speedily – thatspeedily—that the reformer may critique and adjust. The harmonizer or community promoter may enjoy² filling small-but-important gaps in the body of content, over which others might glide past. The investigator will make profoundly insightful contributions, while the challenger may drive momentum.

Recognizing these characteristic behaviors³ [either(either with tag suggestions like how social media has many types of 'likes' or annotative emojis –in Signalemojis—in Signal, or even WhatsAppWhatsApp for example]example), can create the means or 'API' by which to layer interesting functionality --whetherfunctionality—whether privileges or even custom interfaces (!) to surface relevant content and ‘facilitators’.

Graduated development paths, constellations of influence, or 'leveling-up' (all coarsely put), [perhaps(perhaps in the way the Masons (as in a masonic lodge...) do]do) could allow useful structure [in(in seemingly a most open/pliable and ‘accessible’ basic format]format). And these paths may emerge from the ground-level nine 'paths'⁴.

¹ (or give it an SO-specific name)
²overlaps fine and likely
³carefully derived from a large, varied body of spiritual wisdoms... SufismSufism, and many others.
⁴ multiple or all certainly possible to any user: steps on the journey to revelation

²exhibit
deceptively nuanced, even if simple question of a ‘three-way handshake’ - see Sanzhar Yeleuov’s answer, and [charged?] argument, in comments section

perhapsPerhaps, this table helps elucidate possible nuance, and fill gaps in the process (if not, then just illustrative of the possibilities :D)

actionAction	resultResult
client initiates with [packet] data (SYN)	server may now confirm data transmission success, from client (ISN x)
(together) - server responds (ACK) - server sends own data (SYN)	client may confirm data transmission it received from server (ISN y)
client responds (ACK)	both parties understand what comes next (2 ACKs); syncing/test transmissions complete (2 SYNs)