Skip to main content
added 133 characters in body
Source Link

Code Tester

For software and hardware sites directly related to coding in various programming languages, checking and testing the published code for syntactic, thematic and other errors is essential. This feature will improve published content and improve the quality of understanding the behavior of published code for novice programmers...

P.S. I think someday this feature will be replaced by robot testers :-)...

Update 1-response on the comment @starball

  1. This is my point of view and I am not forcing anyone to follow it;
  2. "Do you have any suggestions..." - You could come up with some sort of code quality mark, such as: "Your code has been tested and deserves special attention - Software testers Dr. Jack London and Mark Twain," etc;
  3. "Why do you think that..." - Code testers should be independent of the community because there should be no condescending or prejudicial attitude towards the programmer who has published his code, i.e. the tester-programmer should not be interested in the former merits of the questioner/respondent to the community, he should abstract away from everything except the code itself, since the higher value is the novelty, the expected behavior, the quality and purity of the code;
  4. "Are there any among your acquaintances..." - I'm afraid that this job should not be done by a single tester-programmer, but by a group (3 or more people) of independent, progressive and experienced programmers. Such people are "worth their weight in gold", but I hope that they will be found for every programming language. Maybe they can be selected from the community itself, maybe they should be attracted from outside :-)...

Update 2

This proposal would lead the community to create an "Independent International Software Quality Control System"...

Code Tester

For software and hardware sites directly related to coding in various programming languages, checking and testing the published code for syntactic, thematic and other errors is essential. This feature will improve published content and improve the quality of understanding the behavior of published code for novice programmers...

P.S. I think someday this feature will be replaced by robot testers :-)...

Update-response on the comment @starball

  1. This is my point of view and I am not forcing anyone to follow it;
  2. "Do you have any suggestions..." - You could come up with some sort of code quality mark, such as: "Your code has been tested and deserves special attention - Software testers Dr. Jack London and Mark Twain," etc;
  3. "Why do you think that..." - Code testers should be independent of the community because there should be no condescending or prejudicial attitude towards the programmer who has published his code, i.e. the tester-programmer should not be interested in the former merits of the questioner/respondent to the community, he should abstract away from everything except the code itself, since the higher value is the novelty, the expected behavior, the quality and purity of the code;
  4. "Are there any among your acquaintances..." - I'm afraid that this job should not be done by a single tester-programmer, but by a group (3 or more people) of independent, progressive and experienced programmers. Such people are "worth their weight in gold", but I hope that they will be found for every programming language. Maybe they can be selected from the community itself, maybe they should be attracted from outside :-)...

Code Tester

For software and hardware sites directly related to coding in various programming languages, checking and testing the published code for syntactic, thematic and other errors is essential. This feature will improve published content and improve the quality of understanding the behavior of published code for novice programmers...

P.S. I think someday this feature will be replaced by robot testers :-)...

Update 1-response on the comment @starball

  1. This is my point of view and I am not forcing anyone to follow it;
  2. "Do you have any suggestions..." - You could come up with some sort of code quality mark, such as: "Your code has been tested and deserves special attention - Software testers Dr. Jack London and Mark Twain," etc;
  3. "Why do you think that..." - Code testers should be independent of the community because there should be no condescending or prejudicial attitude towards the programmer who has published his code, i.e. the tester-programmer should not be interested in the former merits of the questioner/respondent to the community, he should abstract away from everything except the code itself, since the higher value is the novelty, the expected behavior, the quality and purity of the code;
  4. "Are there any among your acquaintances..." - I'm afraid that this job should not be done by a single tester-programmer, but by a group (3 or more people) of independent, progressive and experienced programmers. Such people are "worth their weight in gold", but I hope that they will be found for every programming language. Maybe they can be selected from the community itself, maybe they should be attracted from outside :-)...

Update 2

This proposal would lead the community to create an "Independent International Software Quality Control System"...

added 1222 characters in body
Source Link

Code Tester

For software and hardware sites directly related to coding in various programming languages, checking and testing the published code for syntactic, thematic and other errors is essential. This feature will improve published content and improve the quality of understanding the behavior of published code for novice programmers...

P.S. I think someday this feature will be replaced by robot testers :-)...

Update-response on the comment @starball

  1. This is my point of view and I am not forcing anyone to follow it;
  2. "Do you have any suggestions..." - You could come up with some sort of code quality mark, such as: "Your code has been tested and deserves special attention - Software testers Dr. Jack London and Mark Twain," etc;
  3. "Why do you think that..." - Code testers should be independent of the community because there should be no condescending or prejudicial attitude towards the programmer who has published his code, i.e. the tester-programmer should not be interested in the former merits of the questioner/respondent to the community, he should abstract away from everything except the code itself, since the higher value is the novelty, the expected behavior, the quality and purity of the code;
  4. "Are there any among your acquaintances..." - I'm afraid that this job should not be done by a single tester-programmer, but by a group (3 or more people) of independent, progressive and experienced programmers. Such people are "worth their weight in gold", but I hope that they will be found for every programming language. Maybe they can be selected from the community itself, maybe they should be attracted from outside :-)...

Code Tester

For software and hardware sites directly related to coding in various programming languages, checking and testing the published code for syntactic, thematic and other errors is essential. This feature will improve published content and improve the quality of understanding the behavior of published code for novice programmers...

P.S. I think someday this feature will be replaced by robot testers :-)...

Code Tester

For software and hardware sites directly related to coding in various programming languages, checking and testing the published code for syntactic, thematic and other errors is essential. This feature will improve published content and improve the quality of understanding the behavior of published code for novice programmers...

P.S. I think someday this feature will be replaced by robot testers :-)...

Update-response on the comment @starball

  1. This is my point of view and I am not forcing anyone to follow it;
  2. "Do you have any suggestions..." - You could come up with some sort of code quality mark, such as: "Your code has been tested and deserves special attention - Software testers Dr. Jack London and Mark Twain," etc;
  3. "Why do you think that..." - Code testers should be independent of the community because there should be no condescending or prejudicial attitude towards the programmer who has published his code, i.e. the tester-programmer should not be interested in the former merits of the questioner/respondent to the community, he should abstract away from everything except the code itself, since the higher value is the novelty, the expected behavior, the quality and purity of the code;
  4. "Are there any among your acquaintances..." - I'm afraid that this job should not be done by a single tester-programmer, but by a group (3 or more people) of independent, progressive and experienced programmers. Such people are "worth their weight in gold", but I hope that they will be found for every programming language. Maybe they can be selected from the community itself, maybe they should be attracted from outside :-)...
fixed header formatting (for accessibility)
Source Link
V2Blast
  • 7.5k
  • 4
  • 37
  • 77

Code Tester

Code Tester

For software and hardware sites directly related to coding in various programming languages, checking and testing the published code for syntactic, thematic and other errors is essential. This feature will improve published content and improve the quality of understanding the behavior of published code for novice programmers...

P.S. I think someday this feature will be replaced by robot testers :-)...

Code Tester

For software and hardware sites directly related to coding in various programming languages, checking and testing the published code for syntactic, thematic and other errors is essential. This feature will improve published content and improve the quality of understanding the behavior of published code for novice programmers...

P.S. I think someday this feature will be replaced by robot testers :-)...

Code Tester

For software and hardware sites directly related to coding in various programming languages, checking and testing the published code for syntactic, thematic and other errors is essential. This feature will improve published content and improve the quality of understanding the behavior of published code for novice programmers...

P.S. I think someday this feature will be replaced by robot testers :-)...

🍎
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading