Skip to main content
Bounty Ended with 100 reputation awarded by Resistance Is Futile
added 20 characters in body
Source Link
Mithical
  • 83.1k
  • 28
  • 143
  • 306

I'd advocate for a hard line on this.

Something that's utter random garbage is actually less harmful thatthan almost correct garbage that needs an expert to work out.

If you're using the output of a MLmachine learning or AI tool WITHOUT verification and/or disclosure, and we're going to have to waste time working this out, the user clearly isn't here with the right intentions. As such I'd be inclined to treat the user as a severely as needed, and I'd be tempted to start with longer suspensionsuspensions.

ItsIt's a good way to prevent folks who are clearly wastewasting people's time from wasting more of it.

I'd advocate for a hard line on this.

Something that's utter random garbage is actually less harmful that almost correct garbage that needs an expert to work out.

If you're using the output of a ML or AI tool WITHOUT verification and/or disclosure, and we're going to have to waste time working this out, the user clearly isn't here with the right intentions. As such I'd be inclined to treat the user as a severely as needed, and I'd be tempted to start with longer suspension.

Its a good way to prevent folks who clearly waste people's time from wasting more of it.

I'd advocate for a hard line on this.

Something that's utter random garbage is actually less harmful than almost correct garbage that needs an expert to work out.

If you're using the output of a machine learning or AI tool WITHOUT verification and/or disclosure, and we're going to have to waste time working this out, the user clearly isn't here with the right intentions. As such I'd be inclined to treat the user as severely as needed, and I'd be tempted to start with longer suspensions.

It's a good way to prevent folks who are clearly wasting people's time from wasting more of it.

Source Link
Journeyman Geek
  • 183.4k
  • 48
  • 342
  • 731

I'd advocate for a hard line on this.

Something that's utter random garbage is actually less harmful that almost correct garbage that needs an expert to work out.

If you're using the output of a ML or AI tool WITHOUT verification and/or disclosure, and we're going to have to waste time working this out, the user clearly isn't here with the right intentions. As such I'd be inclined to treat the user as a severely as needed, and I'd be tempted to start with longer suspension.

Its a good way to prevent folks who clearly waste people's time from wasting more of it.