Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

6
  • 7
    Can't we all just be passive help officers? I was under the impression that the current way of doing things is to make feature-requests and let the community voice their agreement or disagreement by voting, and then mods can escalate the request to staff by tagging status-review. I think that communal vote and discussion part is important. If we create a "Help Officer" role, are you suggesting that that that communal vote and discussion be removed from the process? And what do you think is insufficient about the status-review tagging process?
    – starball
    Commented Dec 2, 2022 at 20:47
  • @starball The voting on Meta posts to me pretty much says nothing about agreement or disagreement with the post's content. For that, we should at least introduce the concept of a 'poll' where a vote can be cast based on a short one-line proposal (ignoring all remaining text). I don't think the poll-vote should replace the post-vote but rather complement it. The Help Officer could be at the heart of setting up these polls.
    – Sep Roland
    Commented Dec 2, 2022 at 21:16
  • 1
    polls on meta would be no more useful than upvotes and downvotes on meta at determining a meaningful consensus.
    – Kevin B
    Commented Dec 2, 2022 at 21:30
  • @KevinB That's why they have to be very short and focussed.
    – Sep Roland
    Commented Dec 2, 2022 at 21:36
  • That wouldn't fix the reason they're not useful.
    – Kevin B
    Commented Dec 2, 2022 at 21:40
  • 1
    Details that the help center doesn't mention are collected in the [faq] already
    – Bergi
    Commented Dec 2, 2022 at 23:06