Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

6
  • I do believe that will work. As you say, it should be pretty rare for a second comment to take under 15 seconds to compose, unless it's cut-and-paste or very trivial. Thank you!
    – John Rudy
    Commented Jan 24, 2010 at 17:25
  • 41
    It is an improvement, but why keep resetting the timer? It is much better to keep it at 30 seconds or even more, but not reset the timer.. I think this will frustrate users instead of educating them. Commented Jan 24, 2010 at 17:29
  • Why the timer reset? I disagree with the timer = quality argument, but even if I did agree, 30 or 45 seconds if you miscount is way too long. All it does is encourage you to lose your train of thought. It's impolite.
    – jnm2
    Commented Jul 8, 2014 at 19:50
  • 2
    Just taking 15 seconds to tell you how I hate this stupid, obnoxious behavior. Commented Jul 12, 2014 at 21:37
  • 1
    Why is the site going out of its way to be annoying? Commented Jul 13, 2014 at 10:50
  • @Gilles Your sequence of protesting comments appears to be misplaced, given that Jeff Atwood no longer sets these policies.
    – user259867
    Commented Oct 12, 2014 at 20:56