Timeline for Please return the comment rate limit to a flat 30 seconds
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
25 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Dec 16, 2014 at 12:29 | comment | added | SPArcheon - on strike | Detected bug in title. Should be "in 10 seconds flat" :P | |
Jun 11, 2014 at 16:31 | history | edited | tshepang | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
not quite
|
Apr 23, 2014 at 13:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
Apr 23, 2014 at 13:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
Apr 23, 2014 at 9:11 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
Feb 1, 2010 at 3:51 | vote | accept | John Rudy | ||
Jan 24, 2010 at 17:11 | answer | added | Jeff Atwood | timeline score: -15 | |
Jan 24, 2010 at 17:10 | history | edited | Jeff Atwood |
edited tags
|
|
Jan 14, 2010 at 17:29 | vote | accept | John Rudy | ||
Feb 1, 2010 at 3:51 | |||||
Jan 14, 2010 at 10:31 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | diamond mods can edit any comment, but rest assured they are subject to all the standard timeouts and rate limiting of any standard 10k user (which are somewhat relaxed) | |
Jan 14, 2010 at 7:38 | answer | added | balphaStaffMod | timeline score: 13 | |
Jan 14, 2010 at 4:40 | answer | added | Jeff Atwood | timeline score: -23 | |
Jan 14, 2010 at 4:16 | history | edited | Jeff Atwood |
edited tags
|
|
Jan 14, 2010 at 1:03 | comment | added | John Rudy | I kid, I kid. :) I have love for SU. I just don't use it often. :) | |
Jan 13, 2010 at 22:48 | comment | added | womble | "and SuperUser" made me laugh. | |
Jan 13, 2010 at 22:35 | comment | added | John Rudy | I guess I should be glad it's only Meta. For now. | |
Jan 13, 2010 at 22:26 | comment | added | Ladybug Killer | Well, he hasn't rolled it out to the other sites. At least I cannot reproduce the linked bug on SO. And meta has the highest build number right at the moment from all four sites of the trilogy. Nevertheless, for a developer who does not rely heavily on automated tests, it's much too fast. | |
Jan 13, 2010 at 22:11 | comment | added | John Rudy | Oy. 10 - 15 minutes to roll out a software patch to three of the most popular sites on the web (and SuperUser). That is scary, and I think intensifies the likelihood that there was more than coincidence with the new vote count fetch bug. | |
Jan 13, 2010 at 22:00 | comment | added | Ladybug Killer | You still should be scared, dead King. If I read the time stamps correctly, it does not take longer than 15 minutes. Probably only ten. | |
Jan 13, 2010 at 21:44 | comment | added | John Rudy | I was hoping that was the case, because a 5-minute fix would scare me immensely. It was still done quickly, by any measure. | |
Jan 13, 2010 at 21:34 | comment | added | Ladybug Killer | The 5 minute window does not exist for Jeff. He has already edited comments which were older than one hour. | |
Jan 13, 2010 at 20:44 | answer | added | Ether | timeline score: 18 | |
Jan 13, 2010 at 20:26 | answer | added | Vinko VrsalovicStaffMod | timeline score: 44 | |
Jan 13, 2010 at 20:20 | history | asked | John Rudy | CC BY-SA 2.5 |