Skip to main content
Ease of reading edit. Fixed typo.
Source Link
bad_coder
  • 27.2k
  • 7
  • 50
  • 128

For the most part, I think this is good news. I'm glad SE has taken this problem seriously and appreciate the effort to enable multiple licences for answers posted at different times.

But it seems strange and somewhat troubling that the smallest edit (fixing a bit of grammar, removing a redundant word here or there) can effectively relicencerelicense content that was offered on the understanding that an earlier licence applied.

For the most part, I think this is good news. I'm glad SE has taken this problem seriously and appreciate the effort to enable multiple licences for answers posted at different times.

But it seems strange and somewhat troubling that the smallest edit (fixing a bit of grammar, removing a redundant word here or there) can effectively relicence content that was offered on the understanding that an earlier licence applied.

For the most part, I think this is good news. I'm glad SE has taken this problem seriously and appreciate the effort to enable multiple licences for answers posted at different times.

But it seems strange and somewhat troubling that the smallest edit (fixing a bit of grammar, removing a redundant word here or there) can effectively relicense content that was offered on the understanding that an earlier licence applied.

Source Link
mkt
  • 142
  • 1
  • 8

For the most part, I think this is good news. I'm glad SE has taken this problem seriously and appreciate the effort to enable multiple licences for answers posted at different times.

But it seems strange and somewhat troubling that the smallest edit (fixing a bit of grammar, removing a redundant word here or there) can effectively relicence content that was offered on the understanding that an earlier licence applied.