Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

7
  • 4
    Stack Overflow is not the only site that needs to fit in the design. Comparing it to sites that only have to do one trick for one audience is a tad unfair.
    – rene
    Commented Mar 13, 2020 at 7:58
  • 1
    @rene let them come up with a smart solution that needn't put away with color.
    – bad_coder
    Commented Mar 13, 2020 at 8:18
  • 2
    black and white are also colors. Your wish has been granted.
    – rene
    Commented Mar 13, 2020 at 8:20
  • 3
    Monochromatic argument. Why not a b&w TV, b&w smartphone, b&w pc screen...Every post looks like a wall of text now.
    – bad_coder
    Commented Mar 13, 2020 at 10:08
  • 2
    Stack Overflow still has colour, though. The messages when a post is closed or locked, the "featured" sidebar, the "New contributor" message under your profile (and the associated banner I'm seeing as I type this comment)... the site certainly does look less colourful, I'm not denying that, but claiming it's now entirely monochrome seems hyperbolic to me. As does calling it "the worst design move in history".
    – F1Krazy
    Commented Mar 13, 2020 at 11:51
  • @F1Krazy what represents "time&money" for SE members is the Q&A box. All else is an accessory. Those of use habitually battling "wall of text" docs will prefer color, because it eases reading.
    – bad_coder
    Commented Mar 14, 2020 at 22:22
  • 7
    @rene And frankly, on these other sites it's equally shit to not be able to distinguish quotes from genuine content anymore. If anything, SO is probably a site less effected by the disadvantages of this worsening update. Commented Mar 16, 2020 at 20:40