Timeline for What about the community is "toxic" to new users?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2023 at 15:41 | comment | added | V2Blast | Heh. Reading this post and comments years after the fact, it seems to almost exactly describe the Staging Ground being tested on SO. :) | |
| Nov 24, 2020 at 0:47 | comment | added | Mike Martin | I really like the suggestions from @tkruse and @P.Mort! Thanks for being constructive instead of giving a rant on why the newbies are WRONG and SO definitely isn't toxic. | |
| Jun 14, 2020 at 18:20 | comment | added | This_is_NOT_a_forum | In fact, it could invert the negative "close" to "opened with flying colours". There would be no downvotes for those questions that are not accepted anyway (they never go public). | |
| Jun 14, 2020 at 18:20 | comment | added | This_is_NOT_a_forum | Yes, there ought to be some kind of non-public phase (time for improvement, without downvotes and without close votes, with one or more iterations until some criteria are met) instead of immediately blasting it onto the public Internet for public shaming. It could optionally be sped up by sacrificing some amount of reputation points. | |
| Feb 24, 2020 at 7:23 | history | answered | tkruse | CC BY-SA 4.0 |