Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

9
  • 28
    StackExchange has always been about having high-quality content. A requirement for high-quality content necessitates that some people will be filtered out. I consider this filter to be the defining feature of Stack Exchange and not a bug to be eliminated.
    – MechMK1
    Commented Jan 23, 2020 at 12:31
  • 7
    True. But this place also added gamification as motivation factor. Also from early on. And that immediately raises the conflict between upholding quality and "upvotes upvotes upvotes".
    – GhostCat
    Commented Jan 23, 2020 at 12:35
  • 1
    @MechMK1, but that defining feature makes Stack Exchange to be a "non welcoming" to "toxic" environment for help vampires. Commented Jan 23, 2020 at 12:36
  • 3
    @BartvanIngenSchenau Toxic for the vampires (I smell garlic), but also hard for "first day beginners".
    – GhostCat
    Commented Jan 23, 2020 at 12:38
  • 4
    @GhostCatsalutesMonicaC. I agree, which is why I think the actual problem is "Beginners don't know how to write high-quality content" and not "The community reacts badly to low-quality content".
    – MechMK1
    Commented Jan 23, 2020 at 12:49
  • 2
    But I think some of the criticism is valid. If some high-rep user can't be bothered to actually read the question, just skims for keywords, and unjustly closes it, it is far too difficult to have the closing reversed. Commented Jan 23, 2020 at 23:55
  • @PeterMortensen True. Added another paragraph to cover that part.
    – GhostCat
    Commented Jan 24, 2020 at 8:11
  • SO has loads of "high quality" content. Its getting less and less userful, I can see why some consider SO harmful. popular votes are not the same as curation for quality.
    – gbjbaanb
    Commented Jan 24, 2020 at 11:54
  • @gbjbaanb That would be the next level I guess. Some way where maybe 5 or 10 gold badge holders for a tag ... can force that some answer gets a big warning sign on it.
    – GhostCat
    Commented Jan 24, 2020 at 15:00