Timeline for Appoint chat moderators exclusively responsible for moderating chat
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
38 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2022 at 22:15 | comment | added | Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog | There has been a new call from staff regarding additional moderation roles to give out, and I've answered that with a link to this post and a summary. (I left out the part of moderators behaving disruptively, but feel free to comment - I still think that's an important point due to the Charcoal HQ situation that happened in late 2020/early 2021.) | |
| S Sep 16, 2021 at 22:02 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Sep 16, 2021 at 22:02 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| Sep 8, 2021 at 21:11 | comment | added | Adám | That's what I thought, and what I agree would make sense. Have my upvote. | |
| Sep 8, 2021 at 21:10 | comment | added | Mithical | @Adám - No, these hypothetical mods would not have any power outside of chat. Their sphere of influence would be purely contained to chat. | |
| Sep 8, 2021 at 21:07 | comment | added | Adám | Can you clarify if you mean that chat mods should have all the normal mod powers outside chat or not? | |
| S Sep 8, 2021 at 20:41 | history | bounty started | caird coinheringaahing | ||
| S Sep 8, 2021 at 20:41 | history | notice added | caird coinheringaahing | Draw attention | |
| S Sep 25, 2020 at 1:00 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Sep 25, 2020 at 1:00 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| S Sep 16, 2020 at 23:26 | history | bounty started | Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog | ||
| S Sep 16, 2020 at 23:26 | history | notice added | Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog | Draw attention | |
| Nov 1, 2019 at 14:57 | comment | added | user316129 | Sounds like a lot of work, and who is going to set the standards for chat, overall? | |
| Oct 31, 2019 at 17:34 | comment | added | Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog | @EmilJeřábek At present, that is just a test. | |
| Oct 31, 2019 at 17:06 | comment | added | Emil Jeřábek | Teachers’ Lounge will be overhauled: meta.stackexchange.com/a/337228 | |
| Oct 31, 2019 at 15:15 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 31, 2019 at 16:01 | |||||
| Oct 31, 2019 at 15:03 | comment | added | Mithical | @Rob - What? How is this a duplicate of that? This is a feature request for something that doesn't exist, how can it be a duplicate of an announcement saying that the CoC is going to be applied more in chat? | |
| Oct 31, 2019 at 14:55 | comment | added | Rob | Possible duplicate of We're more aggressively enforcing self-moderation in chat | |
| Oct 31, 2019 at 7:38 | comment | added | Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog | Yeah, it's not easily done in all cases...but your post says that categorically can't happen, which is incorrect. (In particular, ROs can't re-kick if the user hasn't spoken since the last kick, and after 24 hours the consecutive kick counter resets.) | |
| Oct 31, 2019 at 7:37 | comment | added | Mithical | @SonictheReinstateMonica-hog - Yes, but someone who knows that can avoid it. I know of one user in particular who always leaves after two kicks in order to avoid that restriction being applied. | |
| Oct 31, 2019 at 7:23 | comment | added | Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog | Actually, it's not quite true that ROs don't have the ability to stop users from creating new rooms. Kicking them three times in a row (so that they're banned for 30 minutes) will also ban them from creating new rooms and inviting users to existing rooms. | |
| Oct 31, 2019 at 6:22 | comment | added | Mithical | @PolyGeo - I think that site moderators should have some level of power in chat, especially the ones patented to their site. But I don't think we can depend on them to moderate chat in general, and recent events have proven that there does need to be some way to moderate the moderators. | |
| Oct 31, 2019 at 6:19 | comment | added | Mithical | @Drew - staff members, which I outlined in the post | |
| Oct 31, 2019 at 6:03 | history | rollback | Mithical |
Rollback to Revision 3
|
|
| Oct 31, 2019 at 2:09 | comment | added | Drew | "We need oversight for the diamond moderators in chat!" "But who will oversee the overseers?!" | |
| Oct 31, 2019 at 2:03 | history | edited | Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 221 characters in body
|
| Oct 31, 2019 at 1:08 | comment | added | Suvitruf - Andrei Apanasik | @Rubiksmoose oh, yeah. Flags from the other chats are pain... | |
| Oct 31, 2019 at 1:08 | comment | added | PolyGeo | If the chat moderators are to be super moderators then I could not vote for this. If you are proposing a separation of chat moderators and Q&A moderators with complementary powers then I might. | |
| Oct 31, 2019 at 1:05 | comment | added | Rubiksmoose | @SuvitrufsaysReinstateMonica Though chat flags still go out to all diamonds everywhere. This part of chat moderation, at the very least, is mechanically worse than useless IMHO. So even in the chats that do work well (I think RPG's is also a great one), there are still issues. | |
| Oct 31, 2019 at 0:43 | comment | added | Suvitruf - Andrei Apanasik | "And... basically? It doesn't" Don't generalize. For example, on ruSO we have mods and Room owners. And we don't have such issue. | |
| Oct 31, 2019 at 0:40 | comment | added | W.O. | Perhaps not in the last month or so, but there was a time a few months ago when there might be half a dozen chat rooms created per day on worldbuilding.se (a minor site among the 173 sites on the network), the workload would hardly seem insignificant. As to validity - I agree, I've not voted yet. | |
| Oct 31, 2019 at 0:39 | comment | added | Mithical | @PolyGeo - not necessarily. Someone should be able to become a chat moderator without also being a site moderator, because the skills needed differ greatly. However, one should not preclude the other. | |
| Oct 31, 2019 at 0:37 | comment | added | PolyGeo | Are you saying that these chat moderators would have no moderator powers beyond moderating chat? | |
| Oct 31, 2019 at 0:31 | history | edited | Alex | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Grammar.
|
| Oct 31, 2019 at 0:15 | comment | added | Mithical | @Weare - I'm not sure what you mean. I don't see any reason why the time commitment would be different from a site moderator - up to the individual how much time they want to invest in it. As for more pressing issues.... so? Whether or not there are more pressing issues shouldn't matter to the validity of a suggestion itself. | |
| Oct 30, 2019 at 23:26 | comment | added | W.O. | Do you have the stats to indicate the volume of reading/time commitment required? It seems to me that there are more long-term issues which need to be resolved before equivocation about moderating chattiness becomes pressing. | |
| Oct 30, 2019 at 23:24 | history | edited | Mithical | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
clarify title
|
| Oct 30, 2019 at 23:10 | history | asked | Mithical | CC BY-SA 4.0 |