Timeline for What would be good "call to action" elements for "Reinstate Monica" profiles?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2020 at 17:24 | history | bounty ended | gnat | ||
| Oct 28, 2019 at 20:59 | history | edited | gung - Reinstate Monica | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| Oct 27, 2019 at 21:01 | comment | added | gbjbaanb | It was a Star Chamber, not a kangaroo court - kangaroos at least pretend to be impartial and "just happen" to come up with their outcome, the star chamber is all done in secret, its way worse WRT justice. I think reinstating Monica would not solve anything, the problem goes deeper. The employee in question needs to be fired IMHO, and a mod needs to be put on the board like a union rep. | |
| Oct 27, 2019 at 19:06 | comment | added | gung - Reinstate Monica | I didn't claim it will have any particular impact. I think this is the common-sense answer to this question in the context it was asked. You may feel free to proffer a different answer. | |
| Oct 27, 2019 at 18:55 | comment | added | gung - Reinstate Monica | @JJJ, I take it the premise of this Q is what to put for people who investigate a profile based on seeing this avatar / username. If someone doesn't know her & doesn't care, I suspect they wouldn't investigate in the first place. If they did anyway out of pure curiosity, it seems incongruous to have something unrelated. | |
| Oct 27, 2019 at 18:50 | comment | added | Scortchi - Reinstate Monica | @JJJ: Because they don't want the elected moderators on the sites they use to be liable to be sacked & smeared in the press on the whim of an SE bigwig. | |
| Oct 27, 2019 at 18:33 | history | edited | gung - Reinstate Monica | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 64 characters in body
|
| Oct 27, 2019 at 18:23 | history | answered | gung - Reinstate Monica | CC BY-SA 4.0 |