Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

6
  • 5
    Very wise words. One should not confuse these sites with Academia, where real progress gets appreciated (at least ideally), or nonprofit organizations. Rather, this site wants us to add posts that get many views, regardless of how innovative they are.
    – user603947
    Commented Oct 26, 2019 at 19:02
  • 8
    I hope it's not just about the numbers. Because what SE did and is doing to Monica is causing many posts on site Metas and the main Meta to skyrocket in views and engagement. I'm hoping those aren't the optics they want.
    – Cyn
    Commented Oct 26, 2019 at 20:05
  • 3
    "Unless you are overtly contributing to pushing those numbers up, SE really doesn't give a flying one about you." Small correction: It's unless you are overtly agreeing with the methods they've decided on for pushing those numbers up. Even when you have a good argument that it's going to backfire, and even when it does. Standard long before the currently mishandled situation.
    – user154510
    Commented Oct 29, 2019 at 21:39
  • It's obviously not just about the numbers. It's also about breaking the rules and then bragging about how the platform is such a cool place.
    – yhyrcanus
    Commented Oct 31, 2019 at 14:33
  • 1
    Surely Maximus Monicas? :)
    – Rob Grant
    Commented Nov 14, 2019 at 22:25
  • 3
    Minimus Maximus Monicus? Maybecus. Commented Nov 14, 2019 at 23:30