Timeline for Why were the Code of Conduct changes received so negatively, and what can / could have been done to change that?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2019 at 17:40 | comment | added | DVK | This is a good answer overall, but remember, if you aren't paying for the product, you aren't a customer, you are the product. SE doesn't give 2 *&!s about you, the user, since their customers are advertisers and Twitter people (the former pay them money, the latter shower them with heart affirming virtuous praise that can't be bought with mere money). The fact that they stole your hard earned work (or to be more nuanced, fraudulently duped you into submitting it WITHOUT clearly stating that you can't erase it AND that its benefits will be abused) doesn't bother them. | |
| Oct 12, 2019 at 17:35 | comment | added | Ian Ringrose | There is one long standing member of the community team I truely respect, they have locked one of my answer and deleted comments I think they should not have, but have shown a understanding of my views. The other members of the community team have all seem to have decided that one small group of people can forced another group of people to say things they believe to be incorrect. | |
| Oct 11, 2019 at 17:59 | history | answered | MSalters - reinstate Monica | CC BY-SA 4.0 |