Timeline for Firing mods and forced relicensing: is Stack Exchange still interested in cooperating with the community?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
17 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 6, 2019 at 2:00 | comment | added | This_is_NOT_a_forum | It is actually an official meme. | |
Oct 3, 2019 at 23:16 | comment | added | einpoklum | The writing on the wall - about a tendency towards authoritarianism - was very clear IMHO already with the publishing of the CoC originally. I see this as a "natural" development of the atmosphere it exudes. | |
Oct 3, 2019 at 0:13 | comment | added | DarkCygnus | I also recall the welcome bandwagon and the way it was... implemented (imposed?), and how rude/abusive started to be weaponized. I also see we have (will have?) a new CEO | |
Oct 2, 2019 at 23:29 | comment | added | user212646 | Why Twitter drives anything other than nonsense into the minds of simple people is beyond me. | |
Oct 1, 2019 at 7:45 | review | Suggested edits | |||
Oct 1, 2019 at 8:57 | |||||
Oct 1, 2019 at 7:36 | comment | added | Kolappan N | Not to mention that they stopped the monthly product updates without announcing. meta.stackexchange.com/q/329659/271215 | |
Sep 30, 2019 at 22:45 | comment | added | Zach Lipton | I also fail to see the relevance of "Twitter Driven Development Part 2" here. Even if you believe that should have been handled differently with the community, a user who tried to remove unnecessarily gendered language from an answer got a rejection with the message that they "deface[d] the post" and were "deliberately destructive." After that, do you really expect someone to take it to meta and receive further invective? It's just not relevant to the issues here. | |
Sep 30, 2019 at 17:33 | comment | added | amon | @ChristianRau Now that I understand more of the background of the firing, I agree with your assessment. I love gender-neutral language, but forcing it on people only stokes resentment. Monica might have been stubborn, but SE's demands are ridiculous. | |
Sep 30, 2019 at 17:08 | comment | added | Anne Daunted GoFundMonica | @PeterMortensen Thanks for reminding me! Somehow, April's post always falls off my radar. Maybe I will add it later. I tried to read it, but it's tough and I couldn't finish it (yet). On the one hand, I understand where they're coming from, on the other hand, the criticism seems based on not understanding what SE is (about). They tried to use a tool without knowing what it's for, it didn't work and instead of trying to find that out, they complain somewhere else. And I've read too many complaints about "unfriendly" DVs and people editing out "thanks" etc. It's tiring. | |
Sep 30, 2019 at 15:10 | history | edited | Lightness Races in Orbit | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Name correction & grammar
|
Sep 30, 2019 at 15:04 | comment | added | This_is_NOT_a_forum | You forgot an instance of Twitter-driven development earlier in 2018, March/April 2018 (the first one, I think). 2019-03-05 | |
Sep 30, 2019 at 14:30 | comment | added | Christian Rau | @amon The recent issue pretty much is excessive political correctness by SE. Or at least it's a significant part of it. | |
Sep 30, 2019 at 13:47 | history | edited | gnat | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
minor correction
|
Sep 30, 2019 at 13:39 | comment | added | Anne Daunted GoFundMonica | @amon It also shows how and that the community is being ignored. A decision that wasn't wrong was overturned by a Community Manager after a complaint on Twitter. | |
Sep 30, 2019 at 13:36 | comment | added | amon | I don't see the relevance of the “Twitter Driven Development Part 2” thing in this context. The issue at hand is not excessive political correctness by SE, but a culture of ignoring the community – and firing a moderator in a pathetic manner. | |
Sep 30, 2019 at 13:28 | comment | added | Anne Daunted GoFundMonica | I want to share this interesting answer. It's not directly related but sheds some light on SE's behavior. | |
Sep 30, 2019 at 13:27 | history | answered | Anne Daunted GoFundMonica | CC BY-SA 4.0 |