Skip to main content
Notice removed Authoritative reference needed by gnat
Bounty Ended with Yaakov Ellis's answer chosen by gnat
Notice added Authoritative reference needed by gnat
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by gnat
Bounty Ended with Lightness Races in Orbit's answer chosen by Zoe - Save the data dump
Notice removed Authoritative reference needed by animusonStaffMod
Notice added Authoritative reference needed by Zoe - Save the data dump
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by Zoe - Save the data dump
illicit is illegal or forbidden; elicit is to draw out or cause
Link
Kate Gregory
  • 75.1k
  • 33
  • 151
  • 303

Will concerns regarding the move to CC BY-SA 4.0 illicitelicit any further dialogue from Stack Exchange, Inc.?

Source Link

Will concerns regarding the move to CC BY-SA 4.0 illicit any further dialogue from Stack Exchange, Inc.?

Fifteen days ago, it was suddenly announced that the user-contributed content on Stack Exchange had been relicensed as CC BY SA 4.0.

The change took immediate and retroactive effect and is still in place.

However, serious concerns were immediately raised about the legality and morality of this change.

To date, there has been no further engagement from Stack Exchange, Inc. on this subject, and consequently there is no indication as to whether these concerns are being considered.

Due to the legal nature of the issue I would understand if Stack Exchange, Inc. has opted to consult their legal partners before making any further statements on the topic.

If that is the case, I respectfully suggest that (at the very least) a short statement to that effect would be in order, as it has already been more than two weeks that the content has been [potentially illegally] re-licensed network-wide. Every day that this is the case, more content is posted, and if indeed the re-licensing of older content is ultimately deemed non-compliant, the technical can of worms involved in remedying the situation grows in mass and squirmishness.

If it is not the case, are there any plans to revisit this topic and feed back to the community as to what the next steps may be to resolve this dispute?

If there are no such plans, please consider that this is not just bikeshedding or whining or complaining or trolling. Licensing of our content, which to a large degree is the Stack Exchange Network, is a serious issue and deserves to be treated seriously.

And, if Stack Exchange, Inc. deems the concerns to be without merit, will we hear a confirmation of that so that we can proceed on that basis?