I thought I'd just say this: being in New Zealand, the Great American Net Neutrality Debate seems to be a symptom of a far bigger issue with infrastructure, regulation, and competition. In short, the NZ consensus is:
Its pretty much a non issue here because our system isnt sh*t
https://www.reddit.com/r/newzealand/comments/6cffdy/net_neutrality_in_nz/
While you're lobbying for net neutrality, you could also try to get your local loops unbundled properly (NZ did this in 2003) to bring prices down and improve competition and service:
https://www.quora.com/Why-is-there-no-Local-loop-unbundling-in-the-USA
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/06/we-dont-need-net-neutrality-we-need-competition/
By the way, most of NZ has fibre now thanks to a public-private partnership. Result: insanely fast internet for everyone and overall benefits for the economy. Maybe you could also lobby for that too.
In short, blazingly fast internet, the ability to choose from a myriad of ISPs, investment in infrastructure, and robust competition (and a government competition watchdog that jumps on anything that even smells like anti-competitiveness) seem to obviate this issue. Maybe I've totally got the wrong end of the stick but that's how it seems to me.