Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • Entirely possible. We've thrown around ideas before about doing some kind of machine learning.
    – Andy
    Commented Feb 25, 2017 at 2:36
  • 7
    We've tried various forms of machine learning, but due to the lack of our experience in that field we have found that regex-based searching is more effective. Commented Feb 25, 2017 at 4:25
  • 4
    I did write a Naive Bayes ML version of Smokey a while back, making use of our existing data for classification sets - but either I don't have enough experience with ML to do it right, or it just plain didn't work, because its accuracy was no better than just guessing.
    – ArtOfCode
    Commented Feb 25, 2017 at 22:49