Skip to main content
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

This is just a clarification of the original post for anyone who answers the bounty.

If there could be a review queue on physics.SE, specifically for non-moderators (say, 15k+ users) for all comment flags, that would help reduce some of the moderator workload and provide an extra incentive for users to reach 15k rep.

Specifically, it would be preferable if an extra flag could be added as well for "answer in a comment". This could also be reviewed by the same 15k+ review queue. This was originally posted herehere, but it was closed as a duplicate of this question.

Here'sHere's another link that's worth citing. This has already been heavily upvoted and asked for, but not implemented.

This is just a clarification of the original post for anyone who answers the bounty.

If there could be a review queue on physics.SE, specifically for non-moderators (say, 15k+ users) for all comment flags, that would help reduce some of the moderator workload and provide an extra incentive for users to reach 15k rep.

Specifically, it would be preferable if an extra flag could be added as well for "answer in a comment". This could also be reviewed by the same 15k+ review queue. This was originally posted here, but it was closed as a duplicate of this question.

Here's another link that's worth citing. This has already been heavily upvoted and asked for, but not implemented.

This is just a clarification of the original post for anyone who answers the bounty.

If there could be a review queue on physics.SE, specifically for non-moderators (say, 15k+ users) for all comment flags, that would help reduce some of the moderator workload and provide an extra incentive for users to reach 15k rep.

Specifically, it would be preferable if an extra flag could be added as well for "answer in a comment". This could also be reviewed by the same 15k+ review queue. This was originally posted here, but it was closed as a duplicate of this question.

Here's another link that's worth citing. This has already been heavily upvoted and asked for, but not implemented.

deleted 4 characters in body
Source Link
auden
  • 9.1k
  • 3
  • 20
  • 30

This is just a clarification of the original post for anyone who answers the bounty.

If there could be a review queue on physics.SE, specifically for non-moderators (say, 15k+ users) for all comment flags, that would help reduce some of the moderator workload and provide an extra incentive for users to reach 15k rep.

Specifically, it would be preferable if an extra flag could be added as well for "answer in a comment". This could also be reviewed by the same 15k+ review queue. This was originally posted here, but it was closed as a duplicate of this question.

Here'sHere's another link that's worth citing...look at the second answer This has already been heavily upvoted and asked for, but not implemented.

This is just a clarification of the original post for anyone who answers the bounty.

If there could be a review queue on physics.SE, specifically for non-moderators (say, 15k+ users) for all comment flags, that would help reduce some of the moderator workload and provide an extra incentive for users to reach 15k rep.

Specifically, it would be preferable if an extra flag could be added as well for "answer in a comment". This could also be reviewed by the same 15k+ review queue. This was originally posted here, but it was closed as a duplicate of this question.

Here's another link that's worth citing...look at the second answer.

This is just a clarification of the original post for anyone who answers the bounty.

If there could be a review queue on physics.SE, specifically for non-moderators (say, 15k+ users) for all comment flags, that would help reduce some of the moderator workload and provide an extra incentive for users to reach 15k rep.

Specifically, it would be preferable if an extra flag could be added as well for "answer in a comment". This could also be reviewed by the same 15k+ review queue. This was originally posted here, but it was closed as a duplicate of this question.

Here's another link that's worth citing. This has already been heavily upvoted and asked for, but not implemented.

added 188 characters in body
Source Link
auden
  • 9.1k
  • 3
  • 20
  • 30

This is just a clarification of the original post for anyone who answers the bounty.

If there could be a review queue on physics.SE, specifically for non-moderators (say, 15k+ users) for all comment flags, that would help reduce some of the moderator workload and provide an extra incentive for users to reach 15k rep.

Specifically, it would be preferable if an extra flag could be added as well for "answer in a comment". This could also be reviewed by the same 15k+ review queue. This was originally posted here, but it was closed as a duplicate of this question.

Here's another link that's worth citing...look at the second answer.

This is just a clarification of the original post for anyone who answers the bounty.

If there could be a review queue on physics.SE, specifically for non-moderators (say, 15k+ users) for all comment flags, that would help reduce some of the moderator workload and provide an extra incentive for users to reach 15k rep.

Specifically, it would be preferable if an extra flag could be added as well for "answer in a comment". This could also be reviewed by the same 15k+ review queue. This was originally posted here, but it was closed as a duplicate of this question.

This is just a clarification of the original post for anyone who answers the bounty.

If there could be a review queue on physics.SE, specifically for non-moderators (say, 15k+ users) for all comment flags, that would help reduce some of the moderator workload and provide an extra incentive for users to reach 15k rep.

Specifically, it would be preferable if an extra flag could be added as well for "answer in a comment". This could also be reviewed by the same 15k+ review queue. This was originally posted here, but it was closed as a duplicate of this question.

Here's another link that's worth citing...look at the second answer.

deleted 13 characters in body
Source Link
Patrick Hofman
  • 91.6k
  • 19
  • 142
  • 341
Loading
Source Link
auden
  • 9.1k
  • 3
  • 20
  • 30
Loading