Timeline for What privilege should 30k users get?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 25, 2015 at 12:33 | comment | added | tchrist | Unlimited might be bad, but double-badger superpowers just might work. | |
S Apr 6, 2015 at 1:47 | history | suggested | xkcdBot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Clarified wording of some bits.
|
Apr 6, 2015 at 1:02 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Apr 6, 2015 at 1:47 | |||||
Apr 4, 2015 at 18:10 | comment | added | Braiam | I would see this coupled with either/both % of times I used all my votes and/or % of votes cast that effectively lead a question to be closed. | |
Apr 4, 2015 at 17:38 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | @Shog9 fair enough, wasn't aware of that. If it matters, I'm really for what Jon offered himself, comments moderation is cool. :-) | |
Apr 4, 2015 at 17:37 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | @rene whoops, looks like you just Summoned him, lol... anyway missed that whole discussion there otherwise wouldn't have suggested it. | |
Apr 4, 2015 at 16:05 | comment | added | Shog9 | Very, very few people hit the current limits on a regular basis; not sure this is much of a privilege. Also, unlimited non-binding votes potentially just creates more work for other users. I'm pretty sympathetic to the desire to make close votes more effective for trusted users, but more weak opinions isn't likely to accomplish much. | |
Apr 4, 2015 at 8:28 | comment | added | rene | You know you are up for a tough battle to get this passed Shog9? | |
Apr 3, 2015 at 21:31 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | @James fair enough, still stick to my belief but removed the "safely". :-) | |
Apr 3, 2015 at 21:31 | history | edited | Shadow Wizard | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 7 characters in body
|
Apr 3, 2015 at 21:29 | comment | added | James | "At 30K we can safely assume they know what they're doing" I completely disagree. Rep does not now nor will it ever = "knowledge of moderating/the site", "good decision making", "careful attitude considering all parameters to make a good judgement" etc. That said, that's another issue, so +1 from me for your actual idea. | |
Apr 3, 2015 at 21:13 | history | answered | Shadow Wizard | CC BY-SA 3.0 |