Timeline for Empowering tag-badge holders part II - let's look at silver?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 12, 2014 at 13:58 | comment | added | nicael | @Ian Yep, would be good. | |
Dec 12, 2014 at 13:12 | comment | added | Ian Ringrose | Also access to the review review queue filter for the given tag, even if they don't have enough rep to access the queue. | |
Nov 12, 2014 at 9:30 | history | edited | gnat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
minor spelling correction
|
Nov 12, 2014 at 6:59 | history | edited | nicael | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 16 characters in body
|
Nov 12, 2014 at 6:24 | comment | added | MTL | Yeah, I saw that also -- it's a great idea, but I don't know how useful it is on per site metas, because (at least in the per site metas that I'm on), there isn't all that much activity, nor are there many silver badge holders. | |
Nov 12, 2014 at 6:20 | comment | added | nicael | @Shokhet Note also active per site meta users: if they don't have much rep on main site, having a silver badge will help them moderate there. | |
Nov 12, 2014 at 6:13 | comment | added | MTL | +1. I hadn't considered active bountiers, that's a great point. | |
Nov 11, 2014 at 21:28 | comment | added | nicael | @Sci Read my last sentence :) | |
Nov 11, 2014 at 21:18 | comment | added | Scimonster | 4k rep gives both closevoting and editing already. | |
Nov 11, 2014 at 21:07 | history | answered | nicael | CC BY-SA 3.0 |