Timeline for What are the guidelines for reviewing?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
28 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2021 at 8:30 | history | edited | Wai Ha Lee | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Made non-initial words in review queue names lowercase to match their current style.
|
| Sep 16, 2021 at 22:14 | history | edited | zcoop98 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Update some verbiage in light of the FP split into FA/ FQ
|
| Jul 23, 2021 at 10:58 | history | edited | stafusa | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Small typo.
|
| Sep 6, 2020 at 21:18 | history | edited | Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 929 characters in body
|
| Apr 25, 2020 at 21:31 | history | edited | Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 64 characters in body
|
| Jun 7, 2019 at 21:21 | history | edited | Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 71 characters in body
|
| Jun 7, 2019 at 20:29 | history | edited | Laurel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 119 characters in body
|
| May 7, 2019 at 9:17 | comment | added | Pikoh | Askers must follow a link to even see it, Shouldn't it be Answerers? | |
| Feb 19, 2017 at 14:30 | history | edited | Braiam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
This is MSE, it should be generic guidance applicable to all sites. Removed all references that made it too SO/technical site centry
|
| Oct 13, 2014 at 17:48 | history | edited | Air | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Missing punctuation, consistent formatting, nested bullets for readability
|
| May 23, 2013 at 20:30 | history | edited | Kate Gregory | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 characters in body
|
| May 21, 2013 at 16:11 | history | edited | Kate Gregory | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 532 characters in body
|
| May 20, 2013 at 22:37 | history | edited | Cody Guldner | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Improved Readability
|
| May 20, 2013 at 19:04 | comment | added | Rachel | @djechlin If you aren't sure what you should do, then skip the post and let someone who is more knowledgeable in that domain handle it. The First Posts queue is almost always empty on SO anyways, so there's no major pressure to process posts in that queue quickly. | |
| May 20, 2013 at 17:45 | history | edited | Kate Gregory | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 267 characters in body
|
| May 20, 2013 at 16:54 | history | edited | Undo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 8 characters in body
|
| May 20, 2013 at 15:47 | history | edited | Cody Guldner | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 289 characters in body; deleted 1 characters in body; deleted 1 characters in body; deleted 6 characters in body; deleted 33 characters in body
|
| May 18, 2013 at 20:51 | history | edited | Kate Gregory | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 455 characters in body
|
| May 18, 2013 at 5:07 | history | edited | Cody Guldner | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 268 characters in body
|
| May 17, 2013 at 22:12 | comment | added | djechlin | If a reviewer doesn't have domain expertise what should they do? It's hard for me to +1/-1 a python question when I have no idea if the answer is right even though it superficially looks good. | |
| May 16, 2013 at 20:16 | history | edited | Aboutblank | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
being kind is awkward
|
| May 16, 2013 at 19:03 | history | edited | Kate Gregory | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1357 characters in body
|
| May 16, 2013 at 18:50 | history | edited | Cody Guldner | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 83 characters in body
|
| May 16, 2013 at 18:43 | history | edited | Cody Guldner | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added flagging and closing reasons
|
| May 13, 2013 at 13:42 | history | edited | Danny Beckett | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 14 characters in body
|
| May 13, 2013 at 13:37 | history | edited | Danny Beckett | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 8 characters in body
|
| S May 13, 2013 at 13:28 | history | answered | Danny Beckett | CC BY-SA 3.0 | |
| S May 13, 2013 at 13:28 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Danny Beckett |