Skip to main content
42 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 22, 2022 at 2:13 history edited Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog CC BY-SA 4.0
Questions violating site-specific policies is already covered under "Close-worthy questions"
Oct 11, 2021 at 8:31 history edited Wai Ha Lee CC BY-SA 4.0
Made non-initial words in review queue names lowercase to match their current style.
Oct 11, 2021 at 3:27 history edited Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog CC BY-SA 4.0
added 24 characters in body
Sep 22, 2021 at 23:47 history edited Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog CC BY-SA 4.0
added 83 characters in body; added 47 characters in body
Jun 20, 2021 at 6:36 history edited Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog CC BY-SA 4.0
added 684 characters in body
May 19, 2021 at 1:05 history edited Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 3 characters in body
Apr 12, 2021 at 12:38 comment added robsch A quick idea: As long as the answer has low quality, allow upvotes but supress that the author gets the reputation points. On review there should be an option to let the author know that fact. S/he gets (back) the points if the answer or question is considered to be good enough. However, that rmight equire something like a re-review.
Apr 9, 2021 at 18:13 comment added Tim Randall Further to what @robsch said: What about an answer that's super brief and without any explanation? On Stack Overflow, these seem to constitute a lot of the auto-flagged answers. Assume we're not a subject matter expert. Do we just assume that they're ok?
Apr 2, 2021 at 18:55 comment added robsch How to deal with posts that only have some lines of code without any explanation and where I'm unable to improve the answer?
Jan 12, 2021 at 9:48 comment added Tomer Shetah How should I review answers with code as image? It might help, but the recommendation for such questions is to delete. So what about answers?
Sep 8, 2020 at 6:36 history edited Luuklag CC BY-SA 4.0
Skipping is an undervalued option, it deserves more prominence. Only posts you are absolutely certain about should be voted as OK.
Sep 8, 2020 at 0:28 history edited Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog CC BY-SA 4.0
added 156 characters in body; added 114 characters in body
Sep 6, 2020 at 21:24 history edited Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog CC BY-SA 4.0
added 93 characters in body
Aug 31, 2020 at 21:55 history edited cherryblossom CC BY-SA 4.0
add space after comma
Jun 3, 2020 at 13:30 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Jan 24, 2020 at 0:01 history edited Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog CC BY-SA 4.0
added 707 characters in body
Sep 11, 2019 at 20:28 history edited Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog CC BY-SA 4.0
added 240 characters in body
Jun 8, 2019 at 4:49 history edited Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog CC BY-SA 4.0
added 430 characters in body
May 6, 2019 at 9:58 history edited fedorqui 'SO stop harming' CC BY-SA 4.0
make link also consist on the other type of flag, since it changed in 2014
S Oct 25, 2017 at 19:35 history suggested CommunityBot CC BY-SA 3.0
fix Markdown numbering and names
Oct 25, 2017 at 18:10 review Suggested edits
S Oct 25, 2017 at 19:35
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:30 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Feb 28, 2016 at 2:58 history rollback Nathan Tuggy
Rollback to Revision 16
Feb 28, 2016 at 2:17 history edited Michał Perłakowski CC BY-SA 3.0
Removed obsolete information - questions no longer appear at the LQP queue.
Dec 23, 2015 at 11:30 history edited Wrzlprmft CC BY-SA 3.0
added 75 characters in body
May 27, 2015 at 18:25 history edited I say Reinstate Monica CC BY-SA 3.0
improved grammar
Dec 14, 2014 at 17:30 history edited Braiam CC BY-SA 3.0
added 83 characters in body
Dec 14, 2014 at 11:26 history edited Wrzlprmft CC BY-SA 3.0
Removing that old, not exactly fitting and SO-specific example (code-only questions “look OK” on SO). Being less strict about minor edits.
Dec 13, 2014 at 20:50 history edited bjb568 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 210 characters in body
Dec 13, 2014 at 16:11 history edited Wrzlprmft CC BY-SA 3.0
Added information on changing dialogue for high-reputation users.
Nov 30, 2014 at 18:23 history edited Wrzlprmft CC BY-SA 3.0
added 20 characters in body
Nov 30, 2014 at 18:11 history edited Wrzlprmft CC BY-SA 3.0
Including many suggestions from http://meta.stackexchange.com/q/141851 and other linked questions; improving formatting and structure; adapting to current dialogue; including some advice on avoiding wrong decisions and helping users.
Apr 24, 2014 at 13:45 history edited CommunityBot
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
Sep 20, 2013 at 10:56 comment added gnat for the record, suggestion on how to pick between Looks Good and Recommend Deletion is provided here: "1. Does the post attempt to answer the question? No Delete, Yes goto step 2. 2. Would it be possible for a reasonably-intelligent English-speaking person familiar with the topic to understand the solution being presented? No Delete, Yes Looks Good."
Jul 27, 2013 at 16:48 history edited bfavaretto CC BY-SA 3.0
Removed TODO as per http://meta.stackoverflow.com/a/190639/167534
May 18, 2013 at 1:34 history edited bfavaretto CC BY-SA 3.0
Added basic workflow. No more lorem ipsum!
May 17, 2013 at 22:16 history edited djechlin CC BY-SA 3.0
added 214 characters in body
May 17, 2013 at 21:51 history edited bfavaretto CC BY-SA 3.0
Expanded reasons to Recommend Deletion based on the auto-comment dialog contents
May 17, 2013 at 16:49 history edited djechlin CC BY-SA 3.0
added 487 characters in body
May 13, 2013 at 13:32 history edited Danny Beckett CC BY-SA 3.0
added 40 characters in body
S May 13, 2013 at 13:26 history answered Danny Beckett CC BY-SA 3.0
S May 13, 2013 at 13:26 history made wiki Post Made Community Wiki by Danny Beckett