Timeline for Allow SVG image uploads
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
19 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 13, 2020 at 15:21 | comment | added | PM 2Ring | @DonaldDuck gist.github.com supports SVG. The mobile view on Github doesn't display a preview, but the desktop view does. Eg, see here. | |
S May 1, 2017 at 21:53 | history | suggested | Floris | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
http links no longer work - need https (as mentioned in the comments, thought it was worth fixing in the answer).
|
May 1, 2017 at 21:06 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S May 1, 2017 at 21:53 | |||||
Mar 23, 2017 at 12:53 | comment | added | Donald Duck | Images only work with HTTPS on Stack Exchange, and I haven't found any HTTPS site to host images that supports SVG. | |
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Apr 29, 2016 at 0:15 | comment | added | WebChemist | @CraigMcQueen looks like wikimedia took down that map, fixed it with a different svg source | |
Apr 29, 2016 at 0:10 | history | edited | WebChemist | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed link
|
Apr 28, 2016 at 2:22 | comment | added | Craig McQueen | I can't see the image at the moment—I just see a "broken image" icon. That's ironic, isn't it? | |
Jan 19, 2016 at 10:00 | comment | added | user9869932 | @WebChemist I accidentally edited this post when trying to correct a different one. Would you please roll-back my change? Thank-you | |
Jan 19, 2016 at 9:55 | review | Suggested edits | |||
Jan 19, 2016 at 10:08 | |||||
Dec 21, 2015 at 9:29 | history | edited | Wrzlprmft | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Link formatting and directly targetting that sandbox answer.
|
Dec 26, 2014 at 12:45 | comment | added | Ilmari Karonen | Here, have a bounty for actually demonstrating a working method of using SVG on SE (even if it does require using a third-party image host). | |
Dec 26, 2014 at 12:44 | history | bounty ended | Ilmari Karonen | ||
Apr 24, 2014 at 13:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
Dec 7, 2012 at 6:23 | comment | added | WebChemist | Modern browsers will let you view inline svg xml right in the html, so its not like it would really need its own SO svg hosting service, they would just need to tweak the way posted svg code is shown... but easier said then done when you have to prevent XSS and that sort of stuff. Example of inline svg code in html: jsfiddle.net/webchemist/c6E7w | |
Dec 7, 2012 at 5:59 | comment | added | bgoodr | Ideally, the StackExchange websites would provide the hosting services. | |
Dec 3, 2012 at 10:01 | comment | added | WebChemist | No I understand this, I just wanted to point out its still possible to show an svg. Would be nice if I could just paste the SVG code directly into a post (maybe you can but nothing I tried worked) but I could see the xml code taking up a lot of space on more complicated images | |
Dec 3, 2012 at 9:59 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | True, however the whole point of dedicated image hosting is preventing rot i.e. cases where the original host is down, then the image is lost forever. | |
Dec 3, 2012 at 9:44 | history | answered | WebChemist | CC BY-SA 3.0 |