Timeline for Automatically destroy unregistered users when their only post gets the red flag treatment

11 events

when toggle format	what		by	license	comment
Mar 5, 2018 at 17:02	answer	added	Monica Cellio		timeline score: 4
Mar 5, 2018 at 5:32	history	edited	Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog	CC BY-SA 3.0	added 354 characters in body
Jun 30, 2012 at 23:35	answer	added	dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten		timeline score: 7
Jun 30, 2012 at 23:00	comment	added	badp		@MichaelMrozek because destroying them directly likely dismisses red flags as unhelpful (the only way to mark red flags as helpful is to red flag yourself, afaik; just the delete button won't do)
Jun 30, 2012 at 22:50	comment	added	Shog9		I can think of at least one example of someone whose first post was spam-destroyed but who later went on to become a valuable member of the community.
Jun 30, 2012 at 22:48	comment	added	Michael Mrozek		Why would you take away the joy of manually destroying those accounts?
Jun 30, 2012 at 22:36	comment	added	user102937		@Ben: In practice, we summarily destroy such accounts; the user will never return anyway.
Jun 30, 2012 at 22:33	answer	added	user102937		timeline score: 4
Jun 30, 2012 at 22:29	comment	added	ben is uǝq backwards		I'm not 100% au fait with how the unregistered users system works but I'm guessing it's based on cookie's etc. If so, isn't it wise to know who the bad ones are so you can block them, if desired? (obviously easy to get around if it is cookie based but it's an additional block on crap)
Jun 30, 2012 at 22:23	history	edited	animusonStaffMod		SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM
Jun 30, 2012 at 22:18	history	asked	badp	CC BY-SA 3.0