Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • 3
    The accept rate is a bad, one-dimensional proxy and I don't see any evidence whatsoever that it's a net positive, and even if so, whether the costs are worth it. (Some of the costs being qualitative, of course.)
    – user154510
    Commented Jun 20, 2012 at 19:38
  • 4
    Regarding your third paragraph, accept rate is not calculated until the user has four or more qualifying questions: questions more than three days old, which have an answer posted.
    – jscs
    Commented Jun 27, 2012 at 17:50
  • @matt see my comment on Kevin's accepted answer here Commented Jan 26, 2013 at 17:49
  • "people will anchor their evaluations on something before determining whether to read a question in-depth" - Precisely.
    – Engineer
    Commented May 18, 2017 at 17:45