Timeline for Decision on rejected edits should be displayed as a notification to the editor
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2020 at 13:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Apr 16, 2017 at 4:47 | comment | added | Stevoisiak | Approach #1 has officially been implemented. | |
| Jul 24, 2012 at 9:49 | comment | added | Kevdog777 | Well I was just banned from editing posts, as I did not know that I was rejected some suggestions. So having the banner appear is a good idea. | |
| Jul 17, 2012 at 15:39 | comment | added | slhck | @Shog9 Since you haven't directly answered my question: Any chances that #1 from Chris' suggestions gets implemented? There's no harm done from that, it's just terribly useful information to have right where it's needed the most. (See also: Users who want to find their rejected edits) | |
| Jun 22, 2012 at 20:30 | comment | added | Shog9 | @slhck: see my answer here - rather than a passive irritation, this feedback should be presented to the user in the context where it matters most. | |
| Jun 22, 2012 at 20:24 | comment | added | eykanal | Now that we have the new notifications system, this is somewhat moot; the notifications system is designed exactly for things like this. | |
| Jun 22, 2012 at 18:53 | comment | added | slhck | @Shog9 Any thoughts about at least implementing change #1 from Chris Frederick's answer? | |
| May 29, 2012 at 1:27 | comment | added | animuson StaffMod | Approach #1 would not work, because that's what it looks like when a user actually does that action on a suggested edit. When viewing it in the [all] tab, it would look like the user actually voted to approve the suggested edit, not that it was their suggested edit which was approved. Related: Improving how suggested edits are displayed in your activity history | |
| May 15, 2012 at 14:53 | comment | added | Shog9 | Strongly disagree that they need an inbox notification for every rejected edit. However, for edits rejected with a custom message this would be appropriate. | |
| May 9, 2012 at 1:31 | history | bounty ended | Rob Hruska | ||
| May 7, 2012 at 22:36 | comment | added | Kevin Vermeer | Approach #2 does seem a bit intrusive, but perhaps it could be improved by only delivering a message after N consecutive rejections, where N=5 or something like that. | |
| Feb 26, 2012 at 20:02 | history | bounty ended | slhck | ||
| Feb 26, 2012 at 7:54 | comment | added | Chris Frederick | @slhck Thanks for the mockup! That's pretty much exactly what I had in mind. | |
| Feb 25, 2012 at 17:12 | comment | added | slhck | I like approach no. 1, maybe it could be combined with a positive/neutral indicator of recent changes, like "You have X new edit decisions" or something. I also added a screenshot to show what it could look like. | |
| Feb 25, 2012 at 17:11 | history | edited | slhck | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added example image
|
| Feb 24, 2012 at 19:48 | history | answered | Chris Frederick | CC BY-SA 3.0 |