Memory Alpha
Advertisement
Memory Alpha
Talk page help
Memory Alpha talk pages are for improving the article only.
For general discussion, please visit Memory Alpha's Discussions feature, or join the chat on Discord.


If I may ask, what is the basis for this name? --From Andoria with Love 03:02, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Sounds made up to me. Also, I know it looks like I made the article in the history, but that is a glitch (see Ten Forward). Jaz talk 03:04, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Page move[]

I don't think "Farpoint entity" is really a fitting name for these things. I know I raised issue with the previous name ("spaceborn entity"), but I think that name is better suited for them since they didn't actually originate from Farpoint; one entity only came to Farpoint in search of its mate, IIRC. --From Andoria with Love 07:53, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

I agree - and in addition to the above, AFAIK "Farpoint" itself is just a nickname used for the station, not an official title for the location. The generic "spaceborn entity" seems to be a better title, although others might be possible. Should it be necessary to disambiguate further, this could be done by a qualifier, for example "spaceborn entity (Deneb IV)". -- Cid Highwind 19:00, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
I think its a good title,for a couple reasons:
1) Everyone knows it as the Farpoint Enity
2) That's what it was for most of the episode
Guess we could call it the Space Jellyfish? JoeCool 06:00, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

I've never heard of it referred to as the "Farpoint entity" and a Google search for that term reveals only 9 hits... so, actually, barely anybody knows it by that name. And, again, this doesn't address the issue of the entity that wasn't Farpoint. --From Andoria with Love 06:03, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Well that thing is a member of the same species. JoeCool 15:03, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes... yes it is. But the other thing wasn't a Farpoint entity. This article's title must encompass the entirety of the species. --From Andoria with Love 05:27, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

For what it's worth, our typical way to find a good article title is to
  1. use the proper name as given in the episode
  2. use an "informal" name given in the episode, if (1) is unknown
  3. use a generic descriptive title, if both (1) and (2) are unknown.
If following (3), we often go by what would be the name of a list article for the whole class a specific object would belong to, eventually followed by a qualifier, if necessary. The title of a list article would probably be "[List of unnamed] spaceborne entities" (Note: "borne", not "born"), so "Spaceborne entity" sounds like a better title than the very informal "Farpoint entity". I'm going to move the article to the old title, but perhaps we can keep "Farpoint entity" as a redirect. -- Cid Highwind 13:54, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
I also found and changed some pages that linked to a list page for all kinds of space-dwelling lifeforms instead of this specific one - there may be more. After those are found, we can of course discuss a better title than the current one. Because of this, I kept the PNA message on the page for the moment... -- Cid Highwind 16:18, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Advertisement