All Questions
144
questions
5
votes
0
answers
126
views
Classification of visible actions for *reducible* representations?
Is there a classification of the pairs $(G,V)$ such that $G$ is reductive [and connected, if you like], and $G$ acts faithfully and visibly on $V$ - crucially, including all cases where $V$ is ...
3
votes
1
answer
193
views
What is the minimum possible k-rank of a quasi-split reductive group over a field?
It is not possible for a quasi-split reductive group $G$ over a field $k$ to be anisotropic (unless it is solvable, hence its connected component is a torus). Indeed, there exists a proper $k$-...
3
votes
0
answers
102
views
When can we lift transitivity of an action from geometric points to a flat cover?
Let $G$ a nice group scheme (say, over $S$), $X$ a smooth $G$-scheme over $S$, that is, $\pi : X \to S$ a smooth, $G$-invariant morphism. Assume that the action is transitive on algebraically closed ...
2
votes
1
answer
397
views
Representation ring of the general linear group
The ring of representations of the symmetric group is isomorphic to the ring of symmetric functions. The Schur-Weyl duality relates the irreducible representations of the symmetric group and that of ...
2
votes
2
answers
255
views
Zariski closure of the image of an induced representation
Let $G$ be a finitely generated discrete group, $H\le G$ a subgroup of finite index $d$, and let $\rho : H\rightarrow \operatorname{GL}(n,\mathbb{C})$ be a representation.
Let $\tilde{\rho} := \...
1
vote
1
answer
203
views
Lie algebras and pulled back group schemes
Suppose I have an extension of fields $L/K$, a group scheme $G_K$ over $\operatorname {Spec} K$. Let $G_L$ denote the pullback of $G_K$ to $\operatorname{Spec} L$. Then, under what conditions on the ...
5
votes
1
answer
437
views
Geometric properties of the adjoint action of a reductive group
$\newcommand{\g}{\mathfrak{g}}$Let $G$ be a reductive algebraic group over field $k = \overline{k}$ and consider the characteristic polynomial $\g \to \g/\!/G := \operatorname{Spec} (k[\g]^G)$ induced ...
2
votes
1
answer
177
views
Orbits in the open set given by Rosenlicht's result
Let $G$ be a linearly reductive algebraic group, and let $X$ be an irreducible affine variety, over an algebraically closed field $\mathbb{K}$, with a regular action of $G$. By Rosenlicht's result, we ...
3
votes
0
answers
107
views
Example of an irreducible component with an open set of infinitely many codimension 2 (codimension 3) orbits
Let $\mathbb{K}$ be an algebraically closed field of characteristics $0$. Let $A$ be a finite dimensional (associative and unital) algebra over $\mathbb{K}$. Assume there is a quiver $Q=(Q_0,Q_1)$, ...
3
votes
1
answer
247
views
Completely reducible subgroups over local field in terms of closed orbits
$\DeclareMathOperator\GL{GL}$Let $ \overline{\mathbb{Q}}_{p} $ be an algebraic closure of $ p $-adic numbers $ \mathbb{Q}_{p} $. A closed subgroup $ H $ of a general linear group $ \GL_{n}(\overline{\...
2
votes
0
answers
98
views
Number of points of parabolic Springer fibres for general reductive groups
My question is the same as this post but for an arbitrary reductive $G$ instead of just $\mathrm{GL}_n$.
Let $G$ be a connected split reductive group over a finite field $k$.
Let $P$ be a parabolic ...
3
votes
0
answers
202
views
A quantity computed from weights of representations -- Have you seen it?
The following quantity has come up in some work my collaborators and I are doing on equivariant D-modules, and in that particular context it seems to be very significant (i.e. it's the only "...
4
votes
0
answers
195
views
Explicit description of wonderful compactification for PGL_3
Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field of positive characteristics. Let $X$ be the wonderful compactification of $PGL_3$ (see for example section 6 of "Frobenius Splitting Methods in Geometry ...
5
votes
1
answer
343
views
Characters of tori in finite reductive group
Let $G$ be a connected split reductive group over a finite field $k$. Suppose $G$ has connected centre. Let $T$ be a maximal split torus with Weyl group $W$. Note that $W$ acts on the finite group $T(...
1
vote
1
answer
282
views
Plus and minus Białynicki-Birula decomposition for normal variety
We work over $\mathbb{C}$. Let $X$ be a normal projective irreducible variety, and let $\mathbb{C}^*$ act nontrivially on $X$. The fixed point locus of $X$, namely $X^{\mathbb{C}^*}$, can be ...