Timeline for Examples of theorems where numerical bounds on $\pi$ played a role
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 13 at 15:56 | comment | added | Thomas Bloom | One could argue this falls under exception 5, since just the trivial estimate $\sum \frac{1}{n^2} < 2 \sum \frac{1}{n(n+1)}=2$ suffices, with no need to mention $\pi$. I suppose it's a matter of taste though, since 'numerical bounds for $\pi$' is equivalent to 'numerical bounds for $\sum \frac{1}{n^2}$', but at least this way one never needs to actually calculate $\pi$ or invoke the Basel problem. | |
May 13 at 12:39 | history | edited | Joe Silverman | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
expanded on the explanation
|
May 12 at 18:48 | comment | added | Terry Tao | Yes, this qualifies! I had thought to add a calculation in one of my own recent papers (page 21 of arxiv.org/pdf/2309.02325) where I needed the fact that $\zeta(2) \zeta(3)/\zeta(6) = 1.94359\dots$ was less than $2$, though this expression is not purely expressible in terms of $\pi$ so this is less compelling of an example. | |
May 12 at 18:29 | history | answered | Joe Silverman | CC BY-SA 4.0 |