Skip to main content
added 192 characters in body
Source Link
Terry Tao
  • 112.3k
  • 32
  • 450
  • 532

In each of these tilings, the upper end converges to the north pole, the bottom end converges to the south pole, and the left and right ends are glued together. The "height" of the tiling is bounded, but the "width" is unbounded. In these constructions, the individual n-gons have small area, but still large diameter (it only takes a bounded number of them to reach from one pole to another); they are quite thin as the number of faces goes to infinity, consistent with the above result. So there are no counterexamples to Q1 of the OP arising from edge-to-edge tilings of convex polygons. I suspect that some of the examples in the linked papers may also provide a positive answer to Q2 or Q3, though one would have to check each of the tilings in these papers separately to do so. (Perhaps the simplest thing would be to contact the authors of these papers for followup questions.)

In each of these tilings, the upper end converges to the north pole, the bottom end converges to the south pole, and the left and right ends are glued together. The "height" of the tiling is bounded, but the "width" is unbounded. In these constructions, the individual n-gons have small area, but still large diameter (it only takes a bounded number of them to reach from one pole to another); they are quite thin as the number of faces goes to infinity, consistent with the above result. So there are no counterexamples to Q1 of the OP arising from edge-to-edge tilings of convex polygons.

In each of these tilings, the upper end converges to the north pole, the bottom end converges to the south pole, and the left and right ends are glued together. The "height" of the tiling is bounded, but the "width" is unbounded. In these constructions, the individual n-gons have small area, but still large diameter (it only takes a bounded number of them to reach from one pole to another); they are quite thin as the number of faces goes to infinity, consistent with the above result. So there are no counterexamples to Q1 of the OP arising from edge-to-edge tilings of convex polygons. I suspect that some of the examples in the linked papers may also provide a positive answer to Q2 or Q3, though one would have to check each of the tilings in these papers separately to do so. (Perhaps the simplest thing would be to contact the authors of these papers for followup questions.)

added 79 characters in body
Source Link
Terry Tao
  • 112.3k
  • 32
  • 450
  • 532

Most of the tilings in the classification have a bounded number of faces (and hence diameter bounded below), but there are some families of tilings with unboundedly many faces, mostly based around the "earth map" tiling construction, which when unwrapped looks something like thisone of these two figures (taken from Figure 3 of https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.11453):

TheIn each of these tilings, the upper end converges to the north pole, the bottom end converges to the south pole, and the left and right ends are glued together, and the bottom of the top half. The "height" of the figuretiling is glued to the top of the bottom half ofbounded, but the figure"width" is unbounded. In these constructions, the individual n-gons have small area, but still large diameter (it only takes a bounded number of them to reach from one pole to another); they are quite thin as the number of faces goes to infinity, consistent with the above result. So there are no counterexamples to Q1 of the OP arising from edge-to-edge tilings of convex polygons.

Most of the tilings in the classification have a bounded number of faces (and hence diameter bounded below), but there are some families of tilings with unboundedly many faces, mostly based around the "earth map" tiling construction, which when unwrapped looks something like this:

The upper end converges to the north pole, the bottom end converges to the south pole, the left and right ends are glued together, and the bottom of the top half of the figure is glued to the top of the bottom half of the figure. In these constructions, the individual n-gons have small area, but still large diameter (it only takes a bounded number of them to reach from one pole to another); they are quite thin as the number of faces goes to infinity, consistent with the above result. So there are no counterexamples to Q1 of the OP arising from edge-to-edge tilings of convex polygons.

Most of the tilings in the classification have a bounded number of faces (and hence diameter bounded below), but there are some families of tilings with unboundedly many faces, mostly based around the "earth map" tiling construction, which when unwrapped looks something like one of these two figures (taken from Figure 3 of https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.11453):

In each of these tilings, the upper end converges to the north pole, the bottom end converges to the south pole, and the left and right ends are glued together. The "height" of the tiling is bounded, but the "width" is unbounded. In these constructions, the individual n-gons have small area, but still large diameter (it only takes a bounded number of them to reach from one pole to another); they are quite thin as the number of faces goes to infinity, consistent with the above result. So there are no counterexamples to Q1 of the OP arising from edge-to-edge tilings of convex polygons.

added 2230 characters in body
Source Link
Terry Tao
  • 112.3k
  • 32
  • 450
  • 532
Loading
added 1 character in body
Source Link
Terry Tao
  • 112.3k
  • 32
  • 450
  • 532
Loading
added 19 characters in body
Source Link
Terry Tao
  • 112.3k
  • 32
  • 450
  • 532
Loading
added 85 characters in body
Source Link
Terry Tao
  • 112.3k
  • 32
  • 450
  • 532
Loading
added 43 characters in body
Source Link
Terry Tao
  • 112.3k
  • 32
  • 450
  • 532
Loading
Source Link
Terry Tao
  • 112.3k
  • 32
  • 450
  • 532
Loading