Skip to main content
added 8 characters in body
Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 183.4k
  • 17
  • 440
  • 636

In 1996 Irving Good himself recalls:

One of the related problems close to philosophy is the estimation of the probability of one category of a multinomial when the order of the cells is irrelevant. [... This] led me on to the development of a hyperprior for the hyperparameter $k$, which I discussed at some length in my book The Estimation of Probabilities (Good, 1965) and in several later works.


As pointed out by AChem, Good does not use the term hyperparameter in his 1965 book. Instead, he speaks of a "flattening constant". In the 1980 paper Some history of the hierarchical Bayesian methodology Good explicitly claims to have invented the latter term, without claiming credit for the former term:

Irving Good himself recalls:

One of the related problems close to philosophy is the estimation of the probability of one category of a multinomial when the order of the cells is irrelevant. [... This] led me on to the development of a hyperprior for the hyperparameter $k$, which I discussed at some length in my book The Estimation of Probabilities (Good, 1965) and in several later works.


As pointed out by AChem, Good does not use the term hyperparameter in his 1965 book. Instead, he speaks of a "flattening constant". In the 1980 paper Some history of the hierarchical Bayesian methodology Good explicitly claims to have invented the latter term, without claiming credit for the former term:

In 1996 Irving Good himself recalls:

One of the related problems close to philosophy is the estimation of the probability of one category of a multinomial when the order of the cells is irrelevant. [... This] led me on to the development of a hyperprior for the hyperparameter $k$, which I discussed at some length in my book The Estimation of Probabilities (Good, 1965) and in several later works.


As pointed out by AChem, Good does not use the term hyperparameter in his 1965 book. Instead, he speaks of a "flattening constant". In the 1980 paper Some history of the hierarchical Bayesian methodology Good explicitly claims to have invented the latter term, without claiming credit for the former term:

deleted 107 characters in body
Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 183.4k
  • 17
  • 440
  • 636

Irving Good himself recalls:

One of the related problems close to philosophy is the estimation of the probability of one category of a multinomial when the order of the cells is irrelevant. [... This] led me on to the development of a hyperprior for the hyperparameter $k$, which I discussed at some length in my book The Estimation of Probabilities (Good, 1965) and in several later works.


As pointed out by AChem, Good does not use the term hyperparameter in his 1965 book. Instead, he speaks of a "flattening constant". In the 1980 paper Some history of the hierarchical Bayesian methodology Good explicitly claims to have invented the latter term, without claiming credit for the former term:

So I would think we can safely assume that Lindley & Smith (1972) is the first usage of hyperparameter.

Irving Good himself recalls:

One of the related problems close to philosophy is the estimation of the probability of one category of a multinomial when the order of the cells is irrelevant. [... This] led me on to the development of a hyperprior for the hyperparameter $k$, which I discussed at some length in my book The Estimation of Probabilities (Good, 1965) and in several later works.


As pointed out by AChem, Good does not use the term hyperparameter in his 1965 book. Instead, he speaks of a "flattening constant". In the 1980 paper Some history of the hierarchical Bayesian methodology Good explicitly claims to have invented the latter term, without claiming credit for the former term:

So I would think we can safely assume that Lindley & Smith (1972) is the first usage of hyperparameter.

Irving Good himself recalls:

One of the related problems close to philosophy is the estimation of the probability of one category of a multinomial when the order of the cells is irrelevant. [... This] led me on to the development of a hyperprior for the hyperparameter $k$, which I discussed at some length in my book The Estimation of Probabilities (Good, 1965) and in several later works.


As pointed out by AChem, Good does not use the term hyperparameter in his 1965 book. Instead, he speaks of a "flattening constant". In the 1980 paper Some history of the hierarchical Bayesian methodology Good explicitly claims to have invented the latter term, without claiming credit for the former term:

added 556 characters in body
Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 183.4k
  • 17
  • 440
  • 636

Irving Good himself recalls:

One of the related problems close to philosophy is the estimation of the probability of one category of a multinomial when the order of the cells is irrelevant. [... This] led me on to the development of a hyperprior for the hyperparameter $k$, which I discussed at some length in my book The Estimation of Probabilities (Good, 1965) and in several later works.


As pointed out by AChem, Good does not use the term hyperparameter in his 1965 book. Instead, he speaks of a "flattening constant". In the 1980 paper Some history of the hierarchical Bayesian methodology Good explicitly claims to have invented the latter term, without claiming credit for the former term:

So I would think we can safely assume that Lindley & Smith (1972) is the first usage of hyperparameter.

Irving Good himself recalls:

One of the related problems close to philosophy is the estimation of the probability of one category of a multinomial when the order of the cells is irrelevant. [... This] led me on to the development of a hyperprior for the hyperparameter $k$, which I discussed at some length in my book The Estimation of Probabilities (Good, 1965) and in several later works.

Irving Good himself recalls:

One of the related problems close to philosophy is the estimation of the probability of one category of a multinomial when the order of the cells is irrelevant. [... This] led me on to the development of a hyperprior for the hyperparameter $k$, which I discussed at some length in my book The Estimation of Probabilities (Good, 1965) and in several later works.


As pointed out by AChem, Good does not use the term hyperparameter in his 1965 book. Instead, he speaks of a "flattening constant". In the 1980 paper Some history of the hierarchical Bayesian methodology Good explicitly claims to have invented the latter term, without claiming credit for the former term:

So I would think we can safely assume that Lindley & Smith (1972) is the first usage of hyperparameter.

added 68 characters in body
Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 183.4k
  • 17
  • 440
  • 636
Loading
Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 183.4k
  • 17
  • 440
  • 636
Loading