Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 18, 2022 at 16:32 comment added Max Alekseyev @PeterTaylor: I've extended A352813 to $n\leq 70$ terms, and confirmed that the equality ${\tt A352813}(n) = {\tt A038667}(2n)$ continues to hold. There is a counterexamples along these lines with the split of 39!, where the smaller factor can be represented as the product of $\lfloor 39/2\rfloor = 19$ numbers but not of $\lceil 39/2\rceil = 20$ numbers. Similarly, the split of $51!$ does not work in the opposite way around.
Apr 5, 2022 at 9:42 history edited Peter Taylor CC BY-SA 4.0
n=29 is an exception to the previous observation that the difference doesn't exceed n!
Apr 4, 2022 at 21:02 comment added Peter Taylor @MaxAlekseyev and others, if you want to add anything before I propose the current draft for publishing then it's A352813.
Apr 2, 2022 at 23:20 comment added Peter Taylor @GregMartin, as explicitly noted, that was always my intention.
Apr 2, 2022 at 23:19 history edited Peter Taylor CC BY-SA 4.0
Extend table; discuss asymptotics
Apr 2, 2022 at 22:19 vote accept Bernardo Recamán Santos
Apr 1, 2022 at 17:21 comment added Greg Martin It would be better if you edited the additional computations into the answer, rather than leaving them as a list of comments.
Mar 31, 2022 at 21:55 comment added Peter Taylor Still no counterexample at $n=20$, where optimal solutions at 470500040794291200 include [2, 3, 6, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 18, 19, 21, 23, 24, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 37, 39]. (I'll merge these comments into the answer at some point, but I don't want to bump every time my search program spits out another result).
Mar 31, 2022 at 13:32 history answered Peter Taylor CC BY-SA 4.0