Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ I checked the Whitaker's Original Paper, Whittaker, E. T. (1915). XVIII.—On the Functions which are represented by the Expansions of the Interpolation-Theory. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 35, 181–194. doi:10.1017/s0370164600017806, he never uses the term cardinal sine or sinus cardinalis. He does introduce the term cardinal. I think the question is now who associated the term sinus cardinalis to the Whitaker's relation. $\endgroup$
    – ACR
    Commented Sep 12, 2019 at 23:34
  • $\begingroup$ When an edit to the question included a link to a similar question on hsm.stackexchange, I realized that my answer is basically the same answer as the accepted answer over there… $\endgroup$
    – Dirk
    Commented Sep 17, 2019 at 6:32