Timeline for On $e^{\pi\sqrt{4\cdot163}}$ and unusual connections
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2015 at 19:11 | comment | added | Tito Piezas III | Thanks. I've elaborated on my question in an answer/comment: mathoverflow.net/a/193394/12905 | |
| Jan 7, 2015 at 7:09 | comment | added | j.c. | I didn't mean to say that any of the above is obvious, but actually rather hoped to prod you to sharpen your question a bit. | |
| Jan 6, 2015 at 23:22 | comment | added | Tito Piezas III | Not dissatisfying, but the connection to black holes and why $e^{\pi\sqrt{163}}$ is a near-integer doesn't seem to be immediately obvious, don't you think? In fact, as pointed out by some comments, the relation $a \approx b$ or $\log(196883) \approx 4\pi$ is beneath notice, let alone somehow related to quantum gravity. | |
| Jan 6, 2015 at 22:26 | history | answered | j.c. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |