Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 18, 2020 at 8:28 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Apr 23, 2017 at 18:24 comment added user111 Just cause this question got attention again, here are my thoughts about Worldbuilding. In my opinion, the problem with Worldbuilding isn't a lack of experts but a lack of imagination. Answers tend to be restricted to tired tropes of Science Fiction and Fantasy. Which is a shame, because those genres should be about innovation, rather than just regurgitating endless variations of Tolkien.
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:52 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/ with https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/
Jan 31, 2017 at 21:11 comment added Zizouz212 Yeah, I can seriously vouch for Open Science. It was the lack of experts able to ask quality questions that effectively brought the site down.
Jan 31, 2017 at 2:37 comment added HDE 226868 @amaranth I would be careful of drawing too many parallels with SFF, even if we both share some of the same userbase. The two sites differ in a few ways, including details of scope and the precise kind of answers we want. Literary analysis is being emphasized here, and it's awfully hard to do that without reading the book in the first place. I'll agree that there are some edge cases, but they're likely rare.
Jan 31, 2017 at 2:34 comment added amaranth I don't know about here, but on scifi.SE, several people write good answers without having read or watched the source material.
Jan 31, 2017 at 2:12 history edited HDE 226868 CC BY-SA 3.0
Pontificated on Worldbuilding.
Jan 29, 2017 at 8:17 comment added user80 I'd agree with the votes here. This is likely the best answer of all those posted; it hits more firmly to the point. (I think the other answers have offered valuable insight, too, don't get me wrong.)
Jan 24, 2017 at 22:18 history answered HDE 226868 CC BY-SA 3.0