Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • But there is a hole in the TOS a mile wide if AI images aren't copyrightable. If Ann uses MJ to generate a picture and shares it publicly on her (non-commercial) blog, Bob can come along and take the picture from Ann's blog. Since there's no contract between Ann and Bob, Ann can't impose contractual limits on Bob's use of the image; since Bob does not use Midjourney, they can't impose contractual limits on his use of the image; and copyright doesn't apply so there can't be licensing limits on his use of the image either, so while Ann can't use the image commercially, Bob can. Commented May 8 at 14:55
  • @OpenAIwasthelaststraw It would still be a breach of contract by Ann, and if Bob knew about the contract, it would probably be a tortious interference with contract by Bob, both of which are actionable.
    – ohwilleke
    Commented May 8 at 18:11