Timeline for How is Midjourney's ToS Legal?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2023 at 20:51 | comment | added | OpenAI was the last straw | This is a very strangely worded ToS. It vacillates and equivocates left and right, is ambiguous in parts, and contradicts itself in others. That's not great for anyone. You don't know what you're getting, and everybody is setting themselves up for some expensive litigation. I'd steer far clear of this company and its services as possible. | |
| Jun 22, 2023 at 17:54 | answer | added | ohwilleke | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jun 22, 2023 at 16:40 | history | edited | user50887 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 3334 characters in body
|
| Jun 22, 2023 at 16:36 | comment | added | user50887 | Yes, I apologize. I'll add it to my original post. | |
| Jun 22, 2023 at 14:12 | answer | added | user6726 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jun 22, 2023 at 14:07 | comment | added | PMF | Can you quote the actual wording? It is different whether they claim copyright on the generated images or just deny using them comercially (in which case you would, if done anyway, "just" violate their TOS) | |
| Jun 22, 2023 at 14:06 | comment | added | Peter M | I'd guess that just because the US Copyright Office says that AI generated images aren't copyrightable doesn't make it so. Remember the monkey copyright, and the legal fights surrounding it? | |
| Jun 22, 2023 at 13:47 | history | edited | user50887 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Jun 22, 2023 at 13:43 | history | edited | user50887 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 15 characters in body
|
| S Jun 22, 2023 at 13:42 | review | First questions | |||
| Jun 22, 2023 at 15:32 | |||||
| S Jun 22, 2023 at 13:42 | history | asked | user50887 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |