Timeline for Is customer entitled to the same car tested in the test drive or in the ad?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2023 at 19:14 | comment | added | Robbie Goodwin | Further… That she first tested it and immediately paid is hardly the point, though it might matter greatly whether she carefully shut the door of the test car and while still gently caressing it, said 'This is the one' or, ignoring the test car, brandished the ad saying 'That's the one for me.' | |
| May 15, 2023 at 19:13 | comment | added | Robbie Goodwin | It means that if the customer could show how her decision to buy was based wholly or largely on information provided through the test drive, she might be able to enforce those detailed specifications, compensation or a full refund The dealer or manufacturer might say local law allowed a 'reasonable facsimile' of the model shown, while many advertisements carry caveats like 'Not all features available on all models…' Far from she 'must have been aware…' she clearly is not and the dealership clearly is an expert, expected to know the difference. More… | |
| May 6, 2023 at 6:35 | comment | added | gnasher729 | The test drive is more specific information than the ad. | |
| May 5, 2023 at 18:19 | comment | added | JosephDoggie | Does this mean your opinion is that the ad was good enough? | |
| May 3, 2023 at 21:34 | history | edited | Robbie Goodwin | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 17 characters in body
|
| May 3, 2023 at 21:27 | history | answered | Robbie Goodwin | CC BY-SA 4.0 |