Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • 1
    Is it possible to prove one has lied about their views? This seems like a matter of opinion and thus impossible to prosecute. Commented Nov 7, 2022 at 15:56
  • 3
    If Walter had previously done such things as: posted white supremacist (WS) views on a website; discussed WS views with others who would testify; boasted that he would get the accused off; participated in WS events; formally joined WS groups, particularly one led by the accused; corresponded with the accused about WS events; had WS literature in his home; contributed money to group led by the accused; been convicted of hate crimes; written and published WS pamphlets or books; that might be evience that Walter lied under oath in noir dire. Views ofte leave evidence. Commented Nov 7, 2022 at 16:05
  • Is the voir dire part of the public written record? In other words, if Walter's boss was not present in court, could he later look up the selection process records to see what Walter said? Or is the voir dire not recorded word for word like a trial, say.
    – BruceWayne
    Commented Nov 8, 2022 at 20:26
  • @BruceWayne I think so but I am not sure. I am sure that reporters can and do attend and report on the voir dite and such reports may be published. Commented Nov 8, 2022 at 21:20