Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

8
  • Wait, what? Are you referring to § 10 ⑶ 2 StAG “civic involvement”? This really refers to prolonged (≥ 2 years) activities with some integrating character, e. g. membership in a refugee organization or so. Commented Feb 18, 2022 at 10:56
  • No, I am not referring to that. I want to strengthen § 10 ⑶ 2 StAG with other supporting documents.
    – quantum
    Commented Feb 18, 2022 at 11:58
  • That part refers to outstanding efforts at integration, - merely doing your civic duties is generally not outstanding, but special cases might make it special - so ask your immigration officer.
    – Trish
    Commented Feb 18, 2022 at 12:45
  • 'Outstanding' is open to interpretation and has been contended, c.f. openjur.de/u/854298.html but your point is valid.
    – quantum
    Commented Feb 18, 2022 at 13:44
  • The plaintiff in that case did show his integration by volunteering in a political party, organized an art exhibition and helped in another. Those are not duties one has to do like paying taxes or appearing ats a witness.
    – Trish
    Commented Feb 18, 2022 at 14:43