Timeline for Receiving a certified letter and the contents is not address to you
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2021 at 22:19 | comment | added | Eric Towers | @AdamV : Counted unresolvable glyph groups. So there could be more words if there are hyphenates or dense punctuation. | |
| May 14, 2021 at 12:43 | history | edited | Mark Johnson | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
spelling correction
|
| May 14, 2021 at 12:21 | comment | added | AdamV | @EricTowers How do you know how many words there were after you stopped reading? | |
| May 14, 2021 at 10:36 | comment | added | obscurans | The "privilege" of turning a page is unlikely to be considered adequate consideration for any contract. EULAs are also increasingly being thrown out on various grounds such as incomprehensibility and reprehensibility. | |
| May 14, 2021 at 6:46 | comment | added | lalala | So is it just the wording? If they would have written:'by flipping the page you agree to the following agreement.....' would that be binding? (basically like the microsoft windows license agreements when you opened the disk packaging). | |
| May 13, 2021 at 22:39 | comment | added | Eric Towers | I wonder what the last three words of @RobertColumbia 's comment are... (It's not like I'm going to read them...) | |
| May 13, 2021 at 7:32 | vote | accept | b degnan | ||
| May 13, 2021 at 0:45 | history | edited | David Siegel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
update based on other answer and somment
|
| May 13, 2021 at 0:41 | comment | added | David Siegel | @Makyen Am interesting point. In light of that if one did choose to return the document to the sender, retaining a copy of the sender's cover letter, and of any letter of explanation sent with it by the OP would be a good idea. So would returning it by certified mail. If the OP ,has sender's email, scanning and sending a copy of the 2 cover letters by email might also help -- it provides a timestamped record inn the files of the email provider. | |
| May 13, 2021 at 0:14 | comment | added | Makyen | I'd suggest not discarding it. There's a reasonable possibility that the sender intended to send something else to the OP. At some point in the future, the sender may claim that the OP was notified of that something else. When it comes time for the OP to dispute that they were notified, the sender is going to pull out their copy of the certified mail receipt/record and say they sent the other thing. Having the actual (wrong) thing which was received will go a long way to supporting the OP's claim that they were not sent the thing the sender may claim they sent. | |
| May 13, 2021 at 0:11 | comment | added | Robert Columbia | This comment is confidential - you may not read, quote, disclose, or otherwise use it in any way. | |
| May 12, 2021 at 15:48 | history | answered | David Siegel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |