Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

5
  • I can't agree. There is legal duty provided by the 14th amendment. If a state only pursues prosecution of cases which are affordable, or which are easy (in terms of time and/or staff) then they are effectively neglecting their obligations under federal law. In addition it can be argued that in many cases failure to prosecute can be considered a violation of state law under state constitutions.
    – SkyLeach
    Commented Jan 17, 2016 at 12:57
  • Dale: AFAIK this isn't entirely accurate. Courts can not only order prosecutors to consider a case, but they can also find an "abuse of prosecutorial discretion" and then decide themselves whether the state has to prosecute a case, enforce a law, etc.
    – feetwet
    Commented Jan 17, 2016 at 13:31
  • 2
    @feetwet could you cite some case law on this subject? Plus prosecutors cannot ethically pursue a case that they don't believe beyond a reasonable doubt...
    – Viktor
    Commented Jan 17, 2016 at 19:36
  • @Viktor - Your question and observation really merit more research ... which I haven't had time to perform. "Abuse of discretion" usually takes other forms. But I suspect that, if nothing else, there must be examples of courts ruling that a prosecutor has abused his discretion for failing to enforce desegregation laws in the U.S. civil rights era. I wonder what the remedies are. Perhaps this merits its own question.
    – feetwet
    Commented Feb 13, 2016 at 18:13
  • 1
    @Viktor - The most recent reference I could find is from a 1988 Yale Law Journal article, "Private Challenges to Prosecutorial Inaction." It notes that (at the time) at least 9 states had statutory schemes that potentially enable private persons to challenge prosecutorial inaction. But apparently there was no case law indicating what redress should be expected.
    – feetwet
    Commented Feb 15, 2016 at 20:48