Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

14
  • 1
    In the hypothetical the only persons who could encounter the dangers would be warranted agents. This isn't about "traps that could injure unsuspecting trespassers." This is, "Fine, you got a warrant. If you try to execute it, I'm warning you that any evidence you're searching for will be destroyed and you could die in the process." Only I know how. In this case can a court compel me to do anything to facilitate a safe and successful execution of a warrant against my property? And if the agents proceed despite that clear warning what liability do I face and under what theories?
    – feetwet
    Commented Sep 25, 2015 at 4:09
  • 1
    @feetwet well there is probable cause for the warrant so there must be some other crime "in evidence."
    – jqning
    Commented Sep 25, 2015 at 4:36
  • 4
    @feetwet People have been charged with assault and murder for setting traps. But with cops, there is an added issue: cops aren't trespassers. They are legally on the property, and it is illegal to use force to prevent their entry.
    – cpast
    Commented Sep 27, 2015 at 19:03
  • 7
    @feetwet presumably you can secure your premises however you want. No. You can't.
    – jqning
    Commented Sep 27, 2015 at 23:05
  • 1
    @jqning - I think the U.S. government set the upper limit for passive security on its nuclear weapon sites. Nowhere is anything resembling a "weapon" employed. It's just layers of steel, cement, and earth. ("Active" security, when present, takes the form of a guard detail.) Other than maybe zoning and fire codes I can't come up with any idea of how "hardening" or "passive security" might break any law.
    – feetwet
    Commented Oct 4, 2015 at 18:06