Timeline for Is it illegal to remove a watermark?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2023 at 17:58 | comment | added | Yakk | I mean, doesn't everyone modify their browser to send a TOS to the website they connect to? "The server agrees to license any response to any https, http or similar request to the user of the browser for any use whatsoever". | |
| Oct 11, 2018 at 22:31 | comment | added | D M | @gnasher729 It could mean that sometimes, but it's not safe to assume that, either. Certainly the wedding photographer would not be OK with it if you bought none of the photographs and just made copies of the watermarked photos. | |
| Oct 11, 2018 at 8:00 | comment | added | gnasher729 | I think the watermark means the copyright holder was Ok with me having a copy with watermark, but wasn't Ok with me having a copy without watermark. For example, I have seen wedding photographers handing out copies with watermark for free, and charging for copies without watermark. | |
| Jan 26, 2018 at 22:43 | history | answered | D M | CC BY-SA 3.0 |