Timeline for Is it possible to legally prohibit someone from linking to specific pages on your website?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2015 at 22:17 | comment | added | Steve Jessop | http:// www.example.com /if-my-address-is--an-original-haiku--then-would-it-infringe? ;-) | |
| Jul 30, 2015 at 6:01 | comment | added | Dan Henderson | @user23013 "users have to agree to some terms before accessing those informations" - are you saying that on your website, users must normally accept your site's terms before they are given access to certain content, but that the other site is linking directly to that content and bypassing your terms acceptance page? If so, you can probably implement a technical solution using cookies: if the user doesn't already have a cookie from you when they reach your content page, redirect them back to the terms acceptance page, where they will get a cookie when they accept your terms. | |
| May 29, 2015 at 13:33 | comment | added | o0'. | I'm not a fan of using examples, but this one with the address and the security post is particularily fitting. | |
| May 29, 2015 at 7:04 | vote | accept | user23013 | ||
| May 29, 2015 at 2:58 | comment | added | kevin | @user23013 it does not mater if the site is meant for the general public or not. See my edit. | |
| May 29, 2015 at 2:57 | history | edited | kevin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 872 characters in body
|
| May 29, 2015 at 0:03 | comment | added | user23013 | One thing is that in my case, the content doesn't need to be open to general public. And users have to agree to some terms before accessing those informations. This seemed to be a good answer to the case where it is open, and this case is more common. So if that makes a big difference, I'm thinking of splitting this question into two. But I'm not sure. | |
| May 28, 2015 at 14:12 | history | answered | kevin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |