Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

5
  • One thing is that in my case, the content doesn't need to be open to general public. And users have to agree to some terms before accessing those informations. This seemed to be a good answer to the case where it is open, and this case is more common. So if that makes a big difference, I'm thinking of splitting this question into two. But I'm not sure.
    – user23013
    Commented May 29, 2015 at 0:03
  • @user23013 it does not mater if the site is meant for the general public or not. See my edit.
    – kevin
    Commented May 29, 2015 at 2:58
  • 1
    I'm not a fan of using examples, but this one with the address and the security post is particularily fitting.
    – o0'.
    Commented May 29, 2015 at 13:33
  • @user23013 "users have to agree to some terms before accessing those informations" - are you saying that on your website, users must normally accept your site's terms before they are given access to certain content, but that the other site is linking directly to that content and bypassing your terms acceptance page? If so, you can probably implement a technical solution using cookies: if the user doesn't already have a cookie from you when they reach your content page, redirect them back to the terms acceptance page, where they will get a cookie when they accept your terms. Commented Jul 30, 2015 at 6:01
  • http:// www.example.com /if-my-address-is--an-original-haiku--then-would-it-infringe? ;-) Commented Sep 1, 2015 at 22:17